On Tue, 2007-03-13 at 00:05 +0300, Serge Belyshev wrote:
quoted text
> Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> writes:
> 
> [snip]
> >> And let's not lose sight of things with this one testcase.
> >> 
> >> RSDL fixes
> >> - every starvation case
> >> - all fairness isssues
> >> - is better 95% of the time on the desktop
> >
> > I don't know where you got that 95% number from.  For the most part, the
> > existing scheduler does well.  If it sucked 95% of the time, it would
> > have been shredded a long time ago.
> >
> 
> I tell you.
> 
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/500027
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/502996
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/500119
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/500784
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/500768
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/502255
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/502282
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/503650
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/503695
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.ck/6512
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.ck/6539
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.ck/6565

Thanks, but I've already read them.  They are part of the reason I
decided to spend some time testing.

	-Mike

-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/