On Tuesday 13 March 2007 01:34, Mike Galbraith wrote:Again I think your test is not a valid testcase. Why use two threads for your encoding with one cpu? Is that what other dedicated desktop OSs would do? And let's not lose sight of things with this one testcase. RSDL fixes - every starvation case - all fairness isssues - is better 95% of the time on the desktop If we fix 95% of the desktop and worsen 5% is that bad given how much else we've gained in the process? Anyway for my next trick I plan to make -nice values not suck again. So we can go full circle and start renicing X (only if you so desire) as well like we used to. I figure that's the only way left to satisfy all requirements to beat even those last 5%. However for the most part I don't even think renicing X will be required (and hasn't been prior to this testcase). Nonetheless unsucking negative nice values is probably worthwhile. I need time to make it so though. Precious sleep and mood has been destroyed this week. -- -ck -
| Andrew Morton | -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 006/196] Chinese: add translation of oops-tracing.txt |
| Greg KH | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Roland Dreier | Re: Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
git: | |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 15/37] dccp: Set per-connection CCIDs via socket options |
| Linus Torvalds | Re: iptables very slow after commit 784544739a25c30637397ace5489eeb6e15d7d49 |
| Herbert Xu | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
