Re: lockdep question (was Re: IPoIB caused a kernel: BUG: softlockup detected on CPU#0!)

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...>, Roland Dreier <roland.list@...>, Tziporet Koren <tziporet@...>, Roland Dreier <rdreier@...>, <general@...>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Monday, March 12, 2007 - 9:51 am

* Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@mellanox.co.il> wrote:


that's still not conclusive - the memory might not have been allocated 
by slab again to detect it. Your magic-number check definitely shows 
some sort of corruption going on, right?

	Ingo
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
lockdep question (was Re: IPoIB caused a kernel: BUG: soft l..., Michael S. Tsirkin, (Sun Mar 11, 9:50 am)
Re: lockdep question (was Re: IPoIB caused a kernel: BUG: so..., Michael S. Tsirkin, (Sun Mar 11, 11:04 am)
Re: lockdep question (was Re: IPoIB caused a kernel: BUG: so..., Michael S. Tsirkin, (Sun Mar 11, 11:22 am)
Re: lockdep question (was Re: IPoIB caused a kernel: BUG: so..., Michael S. Tsirkin, (Sun Mar 11, 12:12 pm)
Re: lockdep question (was Re: IPoIB caused a kernel: BUG: so..., Michael S. Tsirkin, (Mon Mar 12, 9:29 am)
Re: lockdep question (was Re: IPoIB caused a kernel: BUG: so..., Ingo Molnar, (Mon Mar 12, 9:51 am)
Re: lockdep question (was Re: IPoIB caused a kernel: BUG: so..., Michael S. Tsirkin, (Mon Mar 12, 10:20 am)