Re: RSDL for 2.6.21-rc3- 0.29

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Gene Heskett
Date: Sunday, March 11, 2007 - 11:37 pm

On Monday 12 March 2007, Con Kolivas wrote:

I have another backup running right now, after building a plain 
2.6.21-rc3, and rebooting just now for the test.  I don't think its the 
scheduler itself, but is something post 2.6.20 that is messing with tars 
mind and making it think the files it just read to do the estimate phase, 
are all new, so even a level 2 is in effect a level 0.  I'll have an 
answer in about an hour, but its also 2:36am here and I'm headed for the 
rack to get some zzz's.  So I'll report in the morning as to whether or 
not this backup ran as it was supposed to.  I have a feeling its not 
going to though.


-- 
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
"When it comes to humility, I'm the greatest."
-- Bullwinkle Moose

-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
RSDL-mm 0.28, Matt Mackall, (Sat Mar 10, 6:35 pm)
Re: RSDL-mm 0.28, Con Kolivas, (Sat Mar 10, 7:28 pm)
Re: RSDL-mm 0.28, Andrew Morton, (Sat Mar 10, 8:16 pm)
Re: RSDL-mm 0.28, Andrew Morton, (Sat Mar 10, 8:39 pm)
Re: RSDL-mm 0.28, William Lee Irwin III, (Sat Mar 10, 8:43 pm)
Re: RSDL-mm 0.28, Con Kolivas, (Sat Mar 10, 8:44 pm)
Re: RSDL-mm 0.28, Con Kolivas, (Sat Mar 10, 8:59 pm)
Re: RSDL-mm 0.28, Matt Mackall, (Sat Mar 10, 9:01 pm)
Re: RSDL-mm 0.28, Matt Mackall, (Sat Mar 10, 9:03 pm)
Re: RSDL-mm 0.28, Con Kolivas, (Sat Mar 10, 11:19 pm)
Re: RSDL-mm 0.28, Willy Tarreau, (Sun Mar 11, 12:32 am)
Re: RSDL for 2.6.21-rc3- 0.29, Gene Heskett, (Sun Mar 11, 10:38 pm)
Re: RSDL for 2.6.21-rc3- 0.29, Con Kolivas, (Sun Mar 11, 10:48 pm)
Re: RSDL for 2.6.21-rc3- 0.29, Gene Heskett, (Sun Mar 11, 11:37 pm)
Re: RSDL for 2.6.21-rc3- 0.29, Gene Heskett, (Mon Mar 12, 3:04 am)
Re: RSDL for 2.6.21-rc3- 0.29, Douglas McNaught, (Mon Mar 12, 5:51 am)
RE: RSDL-mm 0.28, David Schwartz, (Mon Mar 12, 6:22 am)
Re: RSDL-mm 0.28, Ray Lee, (Mon Mar 12, 7:54 am)
Re: RSDL for 2.6.21-rc3- 0.29, Gene Heskett, (Mon Mar 12, 11:28 am)
Re: RSDL for 2.6.21-rc3- 0.29, Douglas McNaught, (Mon Mar 12, 11:46 am)
Re: RSDL for 2.6.21-rc3- 0.29, Gene Heskett, (Mon Mar 12, 12:10 pm)
Re: RSDL for 2.6.21-rc3- 0.29, Lee Revell, (Mon Mar 12, 12:14 pm)
Re: RSDL for 2.6.21-rc3- 0.29, Douglas McNaught, (Mon Mar 12, 12:43 pm)
Re: RSDL for 2.6.21-rc3- 0.29, Patrick Mau, (Mon Mar 12, 12:54 pm)
Re: RSDL for 2.6.21-rc3- 0.29, Gene Heskett, (Mon Mar 12, 1:24 pm)
Stracing Amanda (was: RSDL for 2.6.21-rc3- 0.29), Douglas McNaught, (Mon Mar 12, 6:32 pm)
Re: Stracing Amanda (was: RSDL for 2.6.21-rc3- 0.29), Gene Heskett, (Mon Mar 12, 7:39 pm)
Re: Stracing Amanda (was: RSDL for 2.6.21-rc3- 0.29), Nish Aravamudan, (Mon Mar 12, 8:01 pm)
Re: Stracing Amanda (was: RSDL for 2.6.21-rc3- 0.29), Gene Heskett, (Mon Mar 12, 9:04 pm)
Re: Stracing Amanda (was: RSDL for 2.6.21-rc3- 0.29), Willy Tarreau, (Mon Mar 12, 9:45 pm)
Re: Stracing Amanda (was: RSDL for 2.6.21-rc3- 0.29), Gene Heskett, (Mon Mar 12, 10:48 pm)
Re: RSDL-mm 0.28, Nick Piggin, (Tue Mar 13, 12:22 am)