* Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com> wrote:

quoted text
> On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 23:08 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> > sorry but that's precisely what your suggestion above results in:
> 
> I'm not trying to suggest we "fake" anything. Your just 
> misunderstanding me.. [...]

as i pointed it out in the previous mail, the problem is that what you 
suggested results in preisely that - a count in the wrong place:

quoted text
> If we change the current "timer" entry to be listed as "lapic-timer" 
> and not "IO-APIC-edge" (or one of the other names) and replace it with 
> the count from LOC

changing the current 'timer' entry (which is line 2 of /proc/interrupts) 
to be 'listed as lapic-timer' and to 'replace it with the count from 
LOC' is faking a count in a line where nothing like that should be.

the kernel simply displays reality: IRQ#0 isnt increasing because it's 
not used, and LOC (local apic timers) is increasing.

	Ingo
-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/