Miklos Szeredi wrote:
quoted text
>> What happens if the application overwrites what it had written some
>> time later?  Nothing.  The page is already read-write, the pte dirty,
>> so even though the file was clearly modified, there's absolutely no
>> way in which this can be used to force an update to the timestamp.
>>     
>
> Which, I realize now, actually means, that the patch is wrong.  Msync
> will have to write protect the page table entries, so that later
> dirtyings may have an effect on the timestamp.

I thought that PeterZ's changes were to write-protect the page after
cleaning it so that future modifications could be detected and tracked
accordingly?  Does the right thing not happen already?

    Thanx...

       ps
-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/