On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 09:32 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
quoted text
> * Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> wrote:
> 
> > >> +#ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT
> > >> +/* After pte_t, etc, have been defined */
> > >> +#include <asm/paravirt.h>
> > >> +#endif
> > >>     
> > >
> > > hm - there's already a CONFIG_PARAVIRT conditional in 
> > > asm-i386/paravirt.h.
> > 
> > Yes, but it happens after asm/paravirt.h has already included some 
> > things, and it ends up causing problems.  paravirt.h still defines 
> > various stub functions in the !CONFIG_PARAVIRT case, so it needs to do 
> > the includes either way.
> 
> hm, it then needs to be fixed first, instead of adding to the mess.

Yes, originally paravirt.h didn't define anything if !CONFIG_PARAVIRT
for this reason: getting it tied into the other headers correctly is a
PITA.

Rusty.


-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/