Re: [patch 01/22] update ctime and mtime for mmaped write

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Peter Staubach
Date: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 - 7:16 am

Miklos Szeredi wrote:

These change still have the undesirable property that although the
modified pages may be flushed to stable storage, the metadata on
the file will not be updated until the application takes positive
action.  This is permissible given the current wording in the
specifications, but it would be much more desirable if sync(2),
fsync(P), or the inode being written out due to normal system
activity would also cause the metadata to be updated.

Perhaps the setting of the flag could be checked in some places
like __sync_single_inode() and do_fsync()?

    Thanx...

       ps
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[patch 01/22] update ctime and mtime for mmaped write, Miklos Szeredi, (Tue Feb 27, 4:14 pm)
Re: [patch 01/22] update ctime and mtime for mmaped write, Peter Staubach, (Wed Feb 28, 7:16 am)
Re: [patch 01/22] update ctime and mtime for mmaped write, Miklos Szeredi, (Wed Feb 28, 10:06 am)
Re: [patch 01/22] update ctime and mtime for mmaped write, Peter Staubach, (Wed Feb 28, 10:21 am)
Re: [patch 01/22] update ctime and mtime for mmaped write, Miklos Szeredi, (Wed Feb 28, 10:51 am)
Re: [patch 01/22] update ctime and mtime for mmaped write, Peter Staubach, (Wed Feb 28, 1:01 pm)
Re: [patch 01/22] update ctime and mtime for mmaped write, Miklos Szeredi, (Wed Feb 28, 1:35 pm)
Re: [patch 01/22] update ctime and mtime for mmaped write, Miklos Szeredi, (Wed Feb 28, 1:58 pm)
Re: [patch 01/22] update ctime and mtime for mmaped write, Peter Staubach, (Wed Feb 28, 2:09 pm)