Re: [patch 00/21] 2.6.19-stable review

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Eric W. Biederman
Date: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 - 1:13 pm

Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> writes:


If you don't have it you at least want the patch below.  It generally
makes the bug non-fatal.

I'm still working my way through possible fixes...  Although the
patch in question is close, and normally fixes it in my utmost
paranoia I can still find problems with it.

Eric


commit 2fb12a9bca5ad9aa6dcd2c639b4a7656a8843ef8
Author: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Date:   Tue Feb 13 13:26:25 2007 +0100

    [PATCH] x86-64: survive having no irq mapping for a vector
    
    Occasionally the kernel has bugs that result in no irq being found for a
    given cpu vector.  If we acknowledge the irq the system has a good chance
    of continuing even though we dropped an irq message.  If we continue to
    simply print a message and not acknowledge the irq the system is likely to
    become non-responsive shortly there after.
    
    AK: Fixed compilation for UP kernels
    
    Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
    Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
    Cc: "Luigi Genoni" <luigi.genoni@pirelli.com>
    Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
    Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>

-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[patch 00/21] 2.6.19-stable review, Greg KH, (Tue Feb 20, 6:36 pm)
[patch 01/21] V4L: cx88: Fix lockup on suspend, Greg KH, (Tue Feb 20, 6:36 pm)
[patch 03/21] V4L: fix ks0127 status flags, Greg KH, (Tue Feb 20, 6:36 pm)
[patch 12/21] bcm43xx: Fix for oops on resume, Greg KH, (Tue Feb 20, 6:37 pm)
Re: [patch 00/21] 2.6.19-stable review, Stefan Richter, (Wed Feb 21, 6:36 am)
Re: [patch 00/21] 2.6.19-stable review, Stefan Richter, (Wed Feb 21, 6:37 am)
Re: [patch 00/21] 2.6.19-stable review, Chuck Ebbert, (Wed Feb 21, 9:38 am)
Re: [patch 00/21] 2.6.19-stable review, Chuck Ebbert, (Wed Feb 21, 9:50 am)
Re: [patch 00/21] 2.6.19-stable review, Chuck Ebbert, (Wed Feb 21, 12:31 pm)
Re: [patch 00/21] 2.6.19-stable review, Andrew Morton, (Wed Feb 21, 12:47 pm)
Re: [patch 00/21] 2.6.19-stable review, Linus Torvalds, (Wed Feb 21, 1:09 pm)
Re: [patch 00/21] 2.6.19-stable review, Eric W. Biederman, (Wed Feb 21, 1:13 pm)
Re: [patch 00/21] 2.6.19-stable review, Chuck Ebbert, (Wed Feb 21, 1:21 pm)
Re: [patch 00/21] 2.6.19-stable review, Greg KH, (Wed Feb 21, 1:39 pm)
Re: [patch 00/21] 2.6.19-stable review, Chuck Ebbert, (Wed Feb 21, 1:44 pm)
Re: [patch 00/21] 2.6.19-stable review, Andi Kleen, (Wed Feb 21, 3:19 pm)
Re: [patch 00/21] 2.6.19-stable review, Andi Kleen, (Wed Feb 21, 3:20 pm)
Re: [patch 00/21] 2.6.19-stable review, Chuck Ebbert, (Wed Feb 21, 3:33 pm)
Re: [patch 00/21] 2.6.19-stable review, Chuck Ebbert, (Wed Feb 21, 3:39 pm)
Re: [patch 00/21] 2.6.19-stable review, Chuck Ebbert, (Wed Feb 21, 3:43 pm)
Re: [patch 00/21] 2.6.19-stable review, Eric W. Biederman, (Wed Feb 21, 3:45 pm)
Re: [patch 01/21] V4L: cx88: Fix lockup on suspend, Chuck Ebbert, (Wed Feb 21, 6:00 pm)
Re: [patch 01/21] V4L: cx88: Fix lockup on suspend, Michael Krufky, (Wed Feb 21, 6:14 pm)
Re: [patch 00/21] 2.6.19-stable review, Andi Kleen, (Wed Feb 21, 6:19 pm)
Re: [patch 00/21] 2.6.19-stable review, Chuck Ebbert, (Thu Feb 22, 9:09 am)
Re: [patch 00/21] 2.6.19-stable review, Eric W. Biederman, (Tue Feb 27, 11:37 pm)
Re: [patch 00/21] 2.6.19-stable review, Zwane Mwaikambo, (Wed Feb 28, 1:51 am)
Re: [patch 00/21] 2.6.19-stable review, Eric W. Biederman, (Wed Feb 28, 5:28 am)
Re: [stable] [patch 00/21] 2.6.19-stable review, Greg KH, (Wed Feb 28, 12:52 pm)
Re: [stable] [patch 00/21] 2.6.19-stable review, Eric W. Biederman, (Wed Feb 28, 4:25 pm)
Re: [patch 00/21] 2.6.19-stable review, Adrian Bunk, (Thu Mar 8, 10:35 pm)