Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Rafael J. Wysocki
Date: Sunday, February 11, 2007 - 4:29 pm

On Sunday, 11 February 2007 23:40, Nigel Cunningham wrote:

That depends on what the driver author tells us.  If he says there's only one
such device in the world and it needs a Linux drivers, but the system in
question will never be suspended, that will be fine, I think.  There are such
cases already and I see no reason why there won't be any more in the future.


No, in general this is not _that_ simple.  Please browse the archives of
bcm43xx-dev, for example.

While I agree that the support for suspend and resume _is_ generally important,
I also admit that there are situations in which it doesn't matter and there are
many people who won't care a whit for it.

Greetings,
Rafael 
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?, Robert Hancock, (Sat Feb 10, 4:20 pm)
Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sat Feb 10, 5:44 pm)
Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?, Pavel Machek, (Sun Feb 11, 10:01 am)
Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?, Nigel Cunningham, (Sun Feb 11, 3:40 pm)
Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sun Feb 11, 4:29 pm)
Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?, Nigel Cunningham, (Sun Feb 11, 4:40 pm)