login
Login
/
Register
Search
Search this site:
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2007
»
February
»
11
Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
view
thread
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From: Tilman Schmidt
Subject:
Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
Date: Sunday, February 11, 2007 - 3:21 pm
Am 11.02.2007 20:42 schrieb Pavel Machek: [...]
quoted text
>> What about this: >> >> "If the device requires that, implement .suspend and .resume or at lea=
st
quoted text
>> define .suspend that will always return -ENOSYS (then people will know=
they
quoted text
>> have to unload the driver before the suspend). Similarly, if you aren=
't sure
quoted text
>> whether or not the device requires .suspend and .resume, define .suspe=
nd that
quoted text
>> will always return -ENOSYS." >=20 > Sounds ok to me. Where should this text go? > Documentation/SubmittingDrivers ?
Documentation/power/devices.txt? --=20 Tilman Schmidt E-Mail:
tilman@imap.cc
Bonn, Germany - In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is.
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
NAK new drivers without proper power management?
, Nigel Cunningham
, (Fri Feb 9, 2:57 pm)
Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
, Arjan van de Ven
, (Fri Feb 9, 3:17 pm)
Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
, Nigel Cunningham
, (Fri Feb 9, 3:26 pm)
Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
, Rafael J. Wysocki
, (Fri Feb 9, 3:44 pm)
Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
, Nigel Cunningham
, (Fri Feb 9, 3:51 pm)
Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
, Rafael J. Wysocki
, (Fri Feb 9, 4:12 pm)
Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
, Nigel Cunningham
, (Fri Feb 9, 4:28 pm)
Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
, Rafael J. Wysocki
, (Fri Feb 9, 5:12 pm)
Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
, Jeff Garzik
, (Fri Feb 9, 5:25 pm)
Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
, Matthew Garrett
, (Fri Feb 9, 8:42 pm)
Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
, Nigel Cunningham
, (Fri Feb 9, 9:42 pm)
Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
, Willy Tarreau
, (Fri Feb 9, 11:43 pm)
Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
, Arjan van de Ven
, (Sat Feb 10, 12:15 am)
Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
, Pavel Machek
, (Sat Feb 10, 12:38 pm)
Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
, Rafael J. Wysocki
, (Sat Feb 10, 3:20 pm)
Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
, Nigel Cunningham
, (Sat Feb 10, 3:37 pm)
Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
, Tilman Schmidt
, (Sat Feb 10, 4:45 pm)
Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
, Tilman Schmidt
, (Sat Feb 10, 4:52 pm)
Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
, Rafael J. Wysocki
, (Sat Feb 10, 5:27 pm)
Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
, Willy Tarreau
, (Sat Feb 10, 11:46 pm)
Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
, Rafael J. Wysocki
, (Sun Feb 11, 6:04 am)
Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
, Pavel Machek
, (Sun Feb 11, 12:42 pm)
Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
, Alan
, (Sun Feb 11, 2:02 pm)
Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
, Tilman Schmidt
, (Sun Feb 11, 3:21 pm)
Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
, Nigel Cunningham
, (Sun Feb 11, 3:37 pm)
Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
, Nigel Cunningham
, (Sun Feb 11, 3:41 pm)
Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
, Nigel Cunningham
, (Sun Feb 11, 3:47 pm)
Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
, Manu Abraham
, (Sun Feb 11, 3:57 pm)
Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
, Rafael J. Wysocki
, (Sun Feb 11, 4:04 pm)
Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
, Nigel Cunningham
, (Sun Feb 11, 4:10 pm)
Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
, Rafael J. Wysocki
, (Sun Feb 11, 4:16 pm)
Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
, Nigel Cunningham
, (Sun Feb 11, 4:20 pm)
Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
, Pavel Machek
, (Sun Feb 11, 4:21 pm)
Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
, Nigel Cunningham
, (Sun Feb 11, 4:22 pm)
Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
, Pavel Machek
, (Sun Feb 11, 4:23 pm)
Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
, Manu Abraham
, (Sun Feb 11, 4:25 pm)
Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
, Pavel Machek
, (Sun Feb 11, 4:29 pm)
Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
, Nigel Cunningham
, (Sun Feb 11, 4:29 pm)
Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
, Nigel Cunningham
, (Sun Feb 11, 4:33 pm)
Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
, Tilman Schmidt
, (Sun Feb 11, 5:10 pm)
Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
, Rafael J. Wysocki
, (Sun Feb 11, 5:20 pm)
Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
, Rafael J. Wysocki
, (Sun Feb 11, 5:24 pm)
Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
, Alan
, (Sun Feb 11, 5:28 pm)
Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
, Nigel Cunningham
, (Sun Feb 11, 9:08 pm)
Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
, Geert Uytterhoeven
, (Mon Feb 12, 1:49 am)
Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
, Arjan van de Ven
, (Mon Feb 12, 2:45 am)
Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
, Gerhard Mack
, (Mon Feb 12, 5:59 am)
Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
, Tino Keitel
, (Mon Feb 12, 6:51 am)
Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
, Pavel Machek
, (Mon Feb 12, 8:04 am)
Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
, Geert Uytterhoeven
, (Mon Feb 12, 8:57 am)
Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
, Pavel Machek
, (Mon Feb 12, 9:52 am)
Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
, Pavel Machek
, (Mon Feb 12, 9:55 am)
Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
, Rafael J. Wysocki
, (Mon Feb 12, 1:06 pm)
Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
, Willy Tarreau
, (Mon Feb 12, 1:20 pm)
Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
, Rafael J. Wysocki
, (Mon Feb 12, 1:31 pm)
Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
, Nigel Cunningham
, (Mon Feb 12, 1:38 pm)
Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
, Rafael J. Wysocki
, (Mon Feb 12, 1:46 pm)
Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
, Pavel Machek
, (Mon Feb 12, 1:58 pm)
Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
, Nigel Cunningham
, (Mon Feb 12, 3:38 pm)
Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
, Tilman Schmidt
, (Tue Feb 13, 2:42 am)
Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
, Tilman Schmidt
, (Tue Feb 13, 3:02 am)
Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
, Brad Campbell
, (Tue Feb 13, 8:23 am)
Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
, Mark Lord
, (Tue Feb 13, 8:55 am)
Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
, Christoph Hellwig
, (Tue Feb 13, 9:06 am)
Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
, Rafael J. Wysocki
, (Tue Feb 13, 12:24 pm)
Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
, Stefan Richter
, (Wed Feb 14, 4:45 pm)
Suspend/resume semantics for ISDN drivers (was: NAK new dr ...
, Tilman Schmidt
, (Sat Mar 3, 3:48 pm)
Re: Suspend/resume semantics for ISDN drivers (was: NAK ne ...
, Rafael J. Wysocki
, (Sun Mar 4, 12:04 pm)
Re: Suspend/resume semantics for ISDN drivers (was: NAK ne ...
, Pavel Machek
, (Thu Mar 8, 4:35 pm)
Navigation
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
Ken Chen
[patch] sched: fix inconsistency when redistribute per-cpu tg->cfs_rq shares.
Ingo Molnar
Re: [PATCH v3] x86: merge the simple bitops and move them to bitops.h
Jan Engelhardt
Re: [PATCH] Allow Kconfig to set default mmap_min_addr protection
Dmitry Torokhov
Re: [2.6 patch] input/serio/hp_sdc.c section fix
Rafael J. Wysocki
[Bug #16380] Loop devices act strangely in 2.6.35
git
:
Steven Grimm
Using git as a general backup mechanism (was Re: Using GIT to store /etc)
Jeff King
Re: [PATCH] git-reset: allow --soft in a bare repo
Johannes Sixt
Re: [PATCH 01/14] msvc: Fix compilation errors in compat/win32/sys/poll.c
Johannes Schindelin
Re: [PATCH] Uninstall rule for top level Makefile
Shawn O. Pearce
Re: [PATCH v2] Speed up bash completion loading
git-commits-head
:
Linux Kernel Mailing List
cgroups: clean up cgroup_pidlist_find() a bit
Linux Kernel Mailing List
sony-laptop: Add support for extended hotkeys
Linux Kernel Mailing List
IB/core: Add support for masked atomic operations
Linux Kernel Mailing List
V4L/DVB (8939): cx18: fix sparse warnings
Linux Kernel Mailing List
ipv6 mcast: Check address family of gf_group in getsockopt(MS_FILTER).
linux-netdev
:
Inaky Perez-Gonzalez
[PATCH 40/40] wimax/i2400m: add CREDITS and MAINTAINERS entries
Karsten Keil
[mISDN PATCH v2 05/19] Reduce stack size in dsp_cmx_send()
linux
Re: 2.6.23-rc8 network problem. Mem leak? ip1000a?
David Miller
Re: tun: Use netif_receive_skb instead of netif_rx
David Miller
Re: [net-next PATCH v2] llc enhancements
freebsd-current
:
Matthew Fleming
Re: [RFC] Outline of USB process integration in the kernel taskqueue system
illoai@gmail.com
Re: OT: 2d password
Hartmut Brandt
Re: problem with nss_ldap
Andrew Reilly
Re: FreeBSD's problems as seen by the BSDForen.de community
Max Laier
Re: Upcoming ABI Breakage in RELENG_7
Colocation donated by:
Syndicate