Re: libsata doesn't like bus without master

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Robert Hancock
Date: Sunday, February 11, 2007 - 11:34 am

Patrick Ale wrote:

Then in that case you should set the remaining drive as master. That's 
just the way PATA is. A lot of BIOSes won't even detect a drive that's 
set as slave with no master present.


Yeah, that's a better point. It's not really complaining, but we could 
probably have a better way of suppressing that message. I think it's 
largely there so that we can debug issues with drives not being detected 
when they should.

-- 
Robert Hancock      Saskatoon, SK, Canada
To email, remove "nospam" from hancockr@nospamshaw.ca
Home Page: http://www.roberthancock.com/

-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: libsata doesn't like bus without master, Robert Hancock, (Sun Feb 11, 11:34 am)
Re: libsata doesn't like bus without master, Patrick Ale, (Sun Feb 11, 11:41 am)
Re: libsata doesn't like bus without master, Henrique de Moraes H ..., (Sun Feb 11, 12:58 pm)
Re: libsata doesn't like bus without master, Patrick Ale, (Sun Feb 11, 1:09 pm)