login
Login
/
Register
Search
Search this site:
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2007
»
February
»
10
Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
view
thread
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From: Nigel Cunningham
Subject:
Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
Date: Friday, February 9, 2007 - 9:18 pm
Hi Dmitry! On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 22:27 -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
quoted text
> Hi Nigel, > > On Friday 09 February 2007 21:05, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > > [ 17.684475] Device driver serio0 lacks bus and class support for being resumed. > > [ 17.684724] Device driver serio1 lacks bus and class support for being resumed. > > [ 17.684874] Device driver psaux lacks bus and class support for being suspended or resumed. > > [ 17.685015] Device driver serio2 lacks bus and class support for being resumed. > > [ 18.373576] Device driver serio3 lacks bus and class support for being resumed. > > [ 18.375666] Device driver serio4 lacks bus and class support for being resumed. > > > > You should probably only warn if driver does not have resume method - not > having suspend is quite valid if driver is able to restore state at resume > without explicitely saving anything at suspend time.
Can do. Will do :) Nigel -
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
, Robert Hancock
, (Fri Feb 9, 6:50 pm)
Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
, Lee Revell
, (Fri Feb 9, 6:59 pm)
Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
, Nigel Cunningham
, (Fri Feb 9, 7:05 pm)
Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
, Nigel Cunningham
, (Fri Feb 9, 7:09 pm)
Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
, Lee Revell
, (Fri Feb 9, 7:22 pm)
[PATCH] Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
, Nigel Cunningham
, (Fri Feb 9, 8:02 pm)
Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
, Kevin Fox
, (Fri Feb 9, 8:21 pm)
Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
, Dmitry Torokhov
, (Fri Feb 9, 8:27 pm)
Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
, Nigel Cunningham
, (Fri Feb 9, 9:18 pm)
Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
, Joseph Fannin
, (Fri Feb 9, 9:35 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Re: NAK new drivers without proper power manag ...
, Rafael J. Wysocki
, (Sat Feb 10, 2:34 am)
Re: [PATCH] Re: NAK new drivers without proper power manag ...
, Nigel Cunningham
, (Sat Feb 10, 3:02 am)
Re: [PATCH] Re: NAK new drivers without proper power manag ...
, Rafael J. Wysocki
, (Sat Feb 10, 3:30 am)
Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
, Stefan Richter
, (Sat Feb 10, 5:47 am)
Re: [PATCH] Re: NAK new drivers without proper power manag ...
, Daniel Barkalow
, (Sat Feb 10, 10:52 am)
Re: [PATCH] Re: NAK new drivers without proper power manag ...
, Rafael J. Wysocki
, (Sat Feb 10, 12:50 pm)
Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
, Adrian Bunk
, (Sat Feb 10, 1:40 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Re: NAK new drivers without proper power manag ...
, Willy Tarreau
, (Sat Feb 10, 11:54 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Re: NAK new drivers without proper power manag ...
, Matthew Garrett
, (Sun Feb 11, 5:13 am)
Re: [PATCH] Re: NAK new drivers without proper power manag ...
, Willy Tarreau
, (Sun Feb 11, 6:09 am)
Re: [PATCH] Re: NAK new drivers without proper power manag ...
, Matthew Garrett
, (Sun Feb 11, 6:19 am)
Re: [PATCH] Re: NAK new drivers without proper power manag ...
, Willy Tarreau
, (Sun Feb 11, 6:37 am)
Re: [PATCH] Re: NAK new drivers without proper power manag ...
, Rafael J. Wysocki
, (Sun Feb 11, 6:50 am)
Re: [PATCH] Re: NAK new drivers without proper power manag ...
, Willy Tarreau
, (Sun Feb 11, 6:57 am)
Re: [PATCH] Re: NAK new drivers without proper power manag ...
, Rafael J. Wysocki
, (Sun Feb 11, 7:36 am)
Re: [PATCH] Re: NAK new drivers without proper power manag ...
, Pekka Enberg
, (Sun Feb 11, 8:19 am)
Re: [PATCH] Re: NAK new drivers without proper power manag ...
, Daniel Barkalow
, (Sun Feb 11, 10:27 am)
Re: [PATCH] Re: NAK new drivers without proper power manag ...
, Robert Hancock
, (Sun Feb 11, 10:36 am)
Re: [PATCH] Re: NAK new drivers without proper power manag ...
, Rafael J. Wysocki
, (Sun Feb 11, 11:31 am)
Re: [PATCH] Re: NAK new drivers without proper power manag ...
, Rafael J. Wysocki
, (Sun Feb 11, 11:53 am)
Re: [PATCH] Re: NAK new drivers without proper power manag ...
, Pavel Machek
, (Sun Feb 11, 12:37 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Re: NAK new drivers without proper power manag ...
, Stefan Richter
, (Sun Feb 11, 2:04 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Re: NAK new drivers without proper power manag ...
, Pavel Machek
, (Sun Feb 11, 2:10 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Re: NAK new drivers without proper power manag ...
, Nigel Cunningham
, (Sun Feb 11, 3:49 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Re: NAK new drivers without proper power manag ...
, Nigel Cunningham
, (Sun Feb 11, 4:06 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Re: NAK new drivers without proper power manag ...
, Rafael J. Wysocki
, (Sun Feb 11, 4:10 pm)
Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
, Pavel Machek
, (Tue Feb 13, 2:08 pm)
Navigation
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
Fortier,Vincent [Montreal]
2.6.21.5 june 30th to july 1st date hang?
Jeff Dike
[ PATCH 2/6 ] UML - Formatting fixes around os_{read_write}_file callers
Liam Girdwood
[PATCH 07/13] regulator: regulator test harness
Oleg Nesterov
Re: Getting the new RxRPC patches upstream
Stefan Seyfried
Re: 2.6.19-rc5: grub is much slower resuming from suspend-to-disk than in 2.6.18
linux-netdev
:
Arnaud Ebalard
Re: [REGRESSION,BISECTED] MIPv6 support broken by f4f914b58019f0
Jan Engelhardt
Re: [PATCH iptables] extension: add xt_cpu match
Jarek Poplawski
Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock().
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
[PATCH 8/8] net/emergency: remove locking from reycling pool if emergncy pools are...
David Miller
Re: [PATCH] qlcnic: dont assume NET_IP_ALIGN is 2
git
:
Jakub Narebski
Re: git on MacOSX and files with decomposed utf-8 file names
Brandon Casey
Re: Thunderbird and patches (was Re: [PATCH v2] Enable setting attach as the def...
Christian Couder
[PATCH 1/3] rev-parse: add test script for "--verify"
Ramkumar Ramachandra
Re: [GSoC update] git-remote-svn: The final one
Junio C Hamano
Re: git-rm isn't the inverse action of git-add
openbsd-misc
:
Joachim Schipper
Re: UVC Webcams
Florin Andrei
SOLVED [was: firewall is very slow, something's wrong]
Todd Alan Smith
Re: Microsoft gets the Most Secure Operating Systems award
Neal Hogan
Re: Need Advice: Thinkpad T60 or T61?
Sam Fourman Jr.
Re: Real men don't attack straw men
git-commits-head
:
Linux Kernel Mailing List
ACPI: Disable ARB_DISABLE on platforms where it is not needed
Linux Kernel Mailing List
m68knommu: add read_barrier_depends() and irqs_disabled_flags()
Linux Kernel Mailing List
[MTD] Add mtd panic_write function pointer
Linux Kernel Mailing List
[ARM] pxa: remove duplicate select statements from Kconfig
Linux Kernel Mailing List
mlx4_core: Don't read reserved fields in mlx4_QUERY_ADAPTER()
Colocation donated by:
Syndicate