On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 09:09:14AM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:Bad example, that is not what happened at all. There was not an in-kernel USB stack when Linus wrote his. Inaky had his all-singing-all-dancing stack outside of the tree, and no one was really helping out with it. Only when Linus added his code to mainline did we all jump on it and _incrementally_ improve it to what we have today. So, in a way, you just proved that we need to do this in an incremental fashion, which is what I was also saying all along :) thanks, greg k-h -
| FUJITA Tomonori | Re: Linux 2.6.25-rc4 |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Jan Engelhardt | intel iommu (Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23) |
| Artem Bityutskiy | [PATCH 11/44 take 2] [UBI] allocation unit header |
git: | |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Natalie Protasevich | [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
