* Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:just to hammer this point home - and while Christoph Lameter isnt online currently to defend SLUB, this issue did come up and i guess there must be other MM hackers that are advocates of SLUB. (otherwise this code couldnt be upstream) I find SLUB a fantastically confusing concept, and that starts at the name. "Unqueued" it says. Lets take a look at the actual code: mm/slub.c: static void __always_inline *slab_alloc(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t gfpflags, int node, void *addr) { ... local_irq_save(flags); c = get_cpu_slab(s, smp_processor_id()); ... else { object = c->freelist; c->freelist = object[c->offset]; } local_irq_restore(flags); so it has a "free list", which is clearly per cpu. Hang on! Isnt that actually a per CPU queue? Which SLUB has not, we are told? The "U" in SLUB. How on earth can an allocator in 2007 claim to have no queuing (which is in essence caching)? Am i on crack with this? Did i miss something really obvious? Ingo --
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Ingo Molnar | Re: [RFT] x86 acpi: normalize segment descriptor register on resume |
| Andrew Morton | -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 004/196] Chinese: add translation of SubmittingPatches |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 15/37] dccp: Set per-connection CCIDs via socket options |
| David Miller | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Ingo Molnar | [bug] stuck localhost TCP connections, v2.6.26-rc3+ |
