Re: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 and Very Slow PCMCIA Compact Flash

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Zan Lynx <zlynx@...>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...>, <linux-pcmcia@...>, <linux-ide@...>, Alan Cox <alan@...>, Jeff Garzik <jeff@...>
Date: Saturday, December 8, 2007 - 6:07 am

On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 22:01:33 -0700 Zan Lynx <zlynx@acm.org> wrote:


argh.  OK.  And Linus's current tree is OK, yes?

In which case we should be OK for 2.6.24 and I guess we can hope like heck
that the dud patch doesn't leak into mainline.  Hopefully Alan will get
some time to look into it before 2.6.25 opens.

<looks>

OK, there's a patch in Jeff's tree "pata_pcmcia: Add support for dumb 8bit
IDE emulations" which could be our guy.

I've uploaded two patches, against 2.6.24-rc4:

http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/zl.with.gz
	origin.patch + git-libata-all.patch

http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/zl.without.gz
	origin.patch + git-libata-all.patch - 5ddcddd4dfeb16a9509dad647f509828d6fee605

It would be great if you could test both.  If zl.with is bad and zl.without
is good then we know that 5ddcddd4dfeb16a9509dad647f509828d6fee605 caused
this problem.

Thanks.

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 and Very Slow PCMCIA Compact Flash, Andrew Morton, (Fri Dec 7, 7:02 pm)
Re: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 and Very Slow PCMCIA Compact Flash, Andrew Morton, (Fri Dec 7, 7:22 pm)
Re: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 and Very Slow PCMCIA Compact Flash, Andrew Morton, (Sat Dec 8, 6:07 am)
Re: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 and Very Slow PCMCIA Compact Flash, Andrew Morton, (Sun Dec 9, 12:04 am)