On Sat, 8 Dec 2007 03:40:49 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
Twenty nine, huh?
It would be useful if these records were sorted in date-of-reportage order
and had a date stamp so we could see how long they've been hanging about.
Something to think about for the post-2.6.24 regression if you'll be handling
those?
That patch has been merged (dc47206e552c0850ad11f7e9a1fca0a3c92f5d65) and
assuming Márton has tested the latest git snapshot
(ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/snapshots) successfully we can
cross it off?
--