login
Login
/
Register
Search
Search this site:
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2007
»
December
»
7
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern AMD64 with MCP51 laptops
view
thread
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From: Alan Cox
Subject:
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern AMD64 with MCP51 laptops
Date: Friday, December 7, 2007 - 11:42 am
On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 19:45:25 +0100 Rene Herman <rene.herman@keyaccess.nl> wrote:
quoted text
> On 07-12-07 18:19, Alan Cox wrote: > > > On Fri, 7 Dec 2007 17:31:16 +0100 > > Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote: > > > >>> You don't need to. Port 0x80 historically is about 8uS so just udelay(8) > >>> and make sure the initial default delay is conservative enough before the > >> How would you make it conservative enough handling let's say a 6Ghz CPU > >> that can execute multiple jumps per cycle? > > > > Pick a sane worst case and go with it at boot. We don't have to be > > accurate before we tune udelay - over long in uSecs isnt going to hurt, > > and most post boot _p's can be replaced by udelay(8) now > > Isn't 8 generally a bit overly long? I believe the norm is 1?
8uS is an ISA bus transaction. --
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Pavel Machek
, (Wed Dec 5, 4:10 am)
RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern AMD ...
, David P. Reed
, (Thu Dec 6, 3:38 pm)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Alan Cox
, (Thu Dec 6, 5:15 pm)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Andi Kleen
, (Fri Dec 7, 3:44 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, David P. Reed
, (Fri Dec 7, 7:50 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Andi Kleen
, (Fri Dec 7, 7:54 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Rene Herman
, (Fri Dec 7, 8:43 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Alan Cox
, (Fri Dec 7, 9:04 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Rene Herman
, (Fri Dec 7, 9:28 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Andi Kleen
, (Fri Dec 7, 9:31 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Alan Cox
, (Fri Dec 7, 10:19 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Alan Cox
, (Fri Dec 7, 11:42 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Rene Herman
, (Fri Dec 7, 11:45 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Rene Herman
, (Fri Dec 7, 12:25 pm)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Alan Cox
, (Fri Dec 7, 2:45 pm)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Andi Kleen
, (Fri Dec 7, 5:21 pm)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, David P. Reed
, (Sat Dec 8, 12:25 pm)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Andi Kleen
, (Sat Dec 8, 12:50 pm)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Alan Cox
, (Sat Dec 8, 1:26 pm)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, David P. Reed
, (Sat Dec 8, 1:47 pm)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Alan Cox
, (Sat Dec 8, 2:04 pm)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Rene Herman
, (Sat Dec 8, 10:04 pm)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Pavel Machek
, (Sun Dec 9, 5:54 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Pavel Machek
, (Sun Dec 9, 6:22 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Dr. David Alan Gilbert
, (Sun Dec 9, 6:41 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Ondrej Zary
, (Sun Dec 9, 8:54 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Andi Kleen
, (Sun Dec 9, 9:59 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Pavel Machek
, (Sun Dec 9, 2:25 pm)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Alan Cox
, (Sun Dec 9, 3:29 pm)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Pavel Machek
, (Sun Dec 9, 4:22 pm)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Rene Herman
, (Sun Dec 9, 9:17 pm)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Krzysztof Halasa
, (Mon Dec 10, 4:30 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Alan Cox
, (Mon Dec 10, 5:02 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Rene Herman
, (Mon Dec 10, 5:08 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Ondrej Zary
, (Mon Dec 10, 11:02 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, H. Peter Anvin
, (Mon Dec 10, 5:31 pm)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, David Newall
, (Mon Dec 10, 6:10 pm)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, H. Peter Anvin
, (Mon Dec 10, 6:25 pm)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, David Newall
, (Mon Dec 10, 6:42 pm)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, H. Peter Anvin
, (Mon Dec 10, 6:46 pm)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, H. Peter Anvin
, (Mon Dec 10, 6:51 pm)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, H. Peter Anvin
, (Mon Dec 10, 10:53 pm)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, H. Peter Anvin
, (Mon Dec 10, 10:58 pm)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Rene Herman
, (Mon Dec 10, 11:54 pm)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Paul Rolland
, (Tue Dec 11, 12:40 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, David Newall
, (Tue Dec 11, 5:08 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Alan Cox
, (Tue Dec 11, 6:14 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Rene Herman
, (Tue Dec 11, 6:16 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Paul Rolland
, (Tue Dec 11, 6:32 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Andi Kleen
, (Tue Dec 11, 6:32 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Pavel Machek
, (Tue Dec 11, 6:47 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Andi Kleen
, (Tue Dec 11, 6:50 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, David Newall
, (Tue Dec 11, 6:50 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Rene Herman
, (Tue Dec 11, 7:15 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Alan Cox
, (Tue Dec 11, 7:25 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Lennart Sorensen
, (Tue Dec 11, 8:14 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Rene Herman
, (Tue Dec 11, 8:28 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Paul Rolland
, (Tue Dec 11, 8:37 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, linux-os (Dick Johnson)
, (Tue Dec 11, 8:41 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Rene Herman
, (Tue Dec 11, 8:53 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Andi Kleen
, (Tue Dec 11, 9:30 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Rene Herman
, (Tue Dec 11, 9:40 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Rene Herman
, (Tue Dec 11, 9:50 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, David P. Reed
, (Tue Dec 11, 9:58 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, David P. Reed
, (Tue Dec 11, 10:00 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, H. Peter Anvin
, (Tue Dec 11, 10:01 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Rene Herman
, (Tue Dec 11, 10:04 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, H. Peter Anvin
, (Tue Dec 11, 10:05 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Rene Herman
, (Tue Dec 11, 10:27 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Alan Cox
, (Tue Dec 11, 10:32 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Pavel Machek
, (Tue Dec 11, 12:16 pm)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Pavel Machek
, (Tue Dec 11, 12:18 pm)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, David P. Reed
, (Tue Dec 11, 12:19 pm)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Pavel Machek
, (Tue Dec 11, 12:36 pm)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Rene Herman
, (Tue Dec 11, 12:59 pm)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Rene Herman
, (Tue Dec 11, 12:59 pm)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Rene Herman
, (Tue Dec 11, 1:00 pm)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Alan Cox
, (Tue Dec 11, 1:16 pm)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, linux-os (Dick Johnson)
, (Tue Dec 11, 1:27 pm)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Rene Herman
, (Tue Dec 11, 1:34 pm)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, David P. Reed
, (Tue Dec 11, 4:56 pm)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, linux-os (Dick Johnson)
, (Wed Dec 12, 6:11 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Alan Cox
, (Wed Dec 12, 9:12 am)
More info on port 80 symptoms on MCP51 machine.
, David P. Reed
, (Wed Dec 12, 1:07 pm)
Re: More info on port 80 symptoms on MCP51 machine.
, Rene Herman
, (Wed Dec 12, 1:26 pm)
Re: Attitude problems.
, linux-os (Dick Johnson)
, (Wed Dec 12, 1:31 pm)
Re: More info on port 80 symptoms on MCP51 machine.
, David P. Reed
, (Wed Dec 12, 1:37 pm)
Re: More info on port 80 symptoms on MCP51 machine.
, Alan Cox
, (Wed Dec 12, 2:01 pm)
Re: More info on port 80 symptoms on MCP51 machine.
, H. Peter Anvin
, (Wed Dec 12, 2:05 pm)
Re: More info on port 80 symptoms on MCP51 machine.
, Alan Cox
, (Wed Dec 12, 2:29 pm)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, David Newall
, (Wed Dec 12, 3:18 pm)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Alan Cox
, (Wed Dec 12, 4:00 pm)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Alan Cox
, (Thu Dec 13, 6:21 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, David P. Reed
, (Thu Dec 13, 6:50 pm)
Re: Attitude problems.
, linux-os (Dick Johnson)
, (Fri Dec 14, 9:01 am)
Re: More info on port 80 symptoms on MCP51 machine.
, Chuck Ebbert
, (Fri Dec 14, 3:05 pm)
Re: More info on port 80 symptoms on MCP51 machine.
, Rene Herman
, (Sat Dec 15, 12:22 am)
RE: More info on port 80 symptoms on MCP51 machine.
, Allen Martin
, (Sat Dec 15, 3:34 pm)
Re: More info on port 80 symptoms on MCP51 machine.
, H. Peter Anvin
, (Sat Dec 15, 3:46 pm)
Navigation
Create content
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
Rafael J. Wysocki
[Bug #16136] Linux 2.6.34 causes system lockup on Compaq Presario 2200 Laptop
Joerg Roedel
Re: [patch] dma-debug: off by one issue
Pekka Enberg
Re: BUG in free_block (tainted)
Tetsuo Handa
Re: [AppArmor #7 0/13] AppArmor security module
Greg Kroah-Hartman
[PATCH 20/36] Driver core: Call device_pm_add() after bus_add_device() in device_a...
git
:
Christian Stimming
git-gui: Fix broken revert confirmation.
Johannes Schindelin
Re: [PATCH 2/2] git-svn: support fetch with autocrlf on
Mark Burton
Re: [PATCH] builtin-branch: highlight current remote branches with an asterisk
Junio C Hamano
Re: git-svnimport
Junio C Hamano
Re: [PATCH 6/6] Teach core object handling functions about gitlinks
linux-netdev
:
Daniel Lezcano
getsockopt(TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT) value change
David Miller
Re: 2.6.27.18: bnx2/tg3: BUG: "scheduling while atomic" trying to ifenslave a seco...
Amit Kumar Salecha
[PATCH NEXT 10/10] qlcnic: add cksum flag
Patrick McHardy
Re: [PATCH RESEND 1/3] netfilter: xtables: inclusion of xt_condition
Julius Volz
[PATCH] IRDA: Fix genlmsg_put() return value check.
git-commits-head
:
Linux Kernel Mailing List
ath9k_htc: Allocate URBs properly
Linux Kernel Mailing List
ath9k: Added get_survey callback in order to get channel noise
Linux Kernel Mailing List
ALSA: snd-usb-caiaq: Do not expose hardware input mode 0 of A4DJ
Linux Kernel Mailing List
cpumask: make irq_set_affinity() take a const struct cpumask
Linux Kernel Mailing List
V4L/DVB (9041): Add support YUAN High-Tech STK7700D (1164:1f08)
openbsd-misc
:
Conor
Re: RFID Reader
Josh Grosse
ssh/sshd challenge-response seems to have stopped working in -current
Stuart Henderson
Re: SquidGuard problem
Henning Brauer
Re: 3ware hardware raid support?
Ryan McBride
Re: Packets Per Second Limit?
Colocation donated by:
Syndicate