On 07-12-07 16:43, Rene Herman wrote:

quoted text
> On 07-12-07 15:54, Andi Kleen wrote:
> 
>>> My machine in question, for example, needs no waiting within 
>>> CMOS_READs at all.   And I doubt any other chip/device needs waiting 
>>> that isn't 
>>
>> I don't know about CMOS, but there were definitely some not too ancient
>> systems (let's say not more than 10 years) who required IO delays in the
>> floppy driver and the 8253/8259. But on those the jumps are already
>> far too fast.
> 
> Also see Alan's replies in the thread I posted a link to:
> 
> http://linux.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/Kernel/2003-09/5700.html
> 
> Also 8254 (PIT) at least it seems.

By the way, David, it would be interesting if you could test 0xed. If your 
problem is some piece of hardware getting upset at LPC bus aborts it's not 
going to matter and we'd know an outb delay is just not an option on your 
system at least. You said you could quickly reproduce the problem with port 
0x80?

Rene.
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/