* Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> wrote:
quoted text > ### Diffstat output
> ./drivers/block/umem.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff .prev/drivers/block/umem.c ./drivers/block/umem.c
> --- .prev/drivers/block/umem.c 2007-12-04 11:11:30.000000000 +1100
> +++ ./drivers/block/umem.c 2007-12-04 11:11:42.000000000 +1100
> @@ -484,7 +484,8 @@ static void process_page(unsigned long d
> page->idx++;
> if (page->idx >= bio->bi_vcnt) {
> page->bio = bio->bi_next;
> - page->idx = page->bio->bi_idx;
> + if (page->bio)
> + page->idx = page->bio->bi_idx;
> }
>
> pci_unmap_page(card->dev, desc->data_dma_handle,
btw., if anyone feels so inclined, this file has quite a number of
coding style issues, as per scripts/checkpatch.pl output:
total: 28 errors, 54 warnings, 1221 lines checked
Ingo
--
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: Regression - 2.6.24-rc3 - umem nvram card driver oops , Ingo Molnar , (Tue Dec 4, 5:37 am)