On Dec 4, 2007 4:20 PM, Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de> wrote:
quoted text
> On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 03:53:15PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> > On Dec 4, 2007 3:46 PM, Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 02:45:47PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > > Does the KOBJ_NAME_LEN really means the limit of kobject name length? seems
> > > > not . And if it's true, is the KOBJ_NAME_LEN of 20 enough to use?
> > >
> > > No, not anymore, the kobject name is totally dynamic.
> >
> > Eh, Why does this macro still exist? If KOBJ_NAME_LEN is really
> > needed, maybe it should be renamed to something else to avoid
> > misleading.
>
> Right now other .h files use it also.  It isn't hurting anything for
> now, and Kay has some patches he is working on to get rid of the static
> bus_id array, which will then let us get rid of that define entirely.
>

Good to know, thanks!

quoted text
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/