login
Header Space

 
 

Re: TOMOYO Linux Security Goal

Score:
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <Valdis.Kletnieks@...>, Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...>
Cc: <serue@...>, <linux-security-module@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Monday, December 31, 2007 - 11:27 am

--- Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
 

Struth. (I'm practicing my Australian, it's gotten rusty)
I say that the the only rational way to create a policy is to
decide what you want the system to do and create your policy
based on that. I think that calling something that does nothing
more than enforce existing behavior without thought on what the
behavior ought to be a "policy" does disservice to the entire
security community. I realize that I'm in the minority on this
one. Oh well.


Casey Schaufler
casey@schaufler-ca.com
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
TOMOYO Linux Security Goal, Tetsuo Handa, (Tue Dec 25, 8:33 am)
Re: TOMOYO Linux Security Goal, Serge E. Hallyn, (Wed Dec 26, 12:42 pm)
Re: TOMOYO Linux Security Goal, Tetsuo Handa, (Thu Dec 27, 9:00 am)
Re: TOMOYO Linux Security Goal, Serge E. Hallyn, (Thu Dec 27, 10:54 am)
Re: TOMOYO Linux Security Goal, Tetsuo Handa, (Fri Dec 28, 10:32 am)
Re: TOMOYO Linux Security Goal, , (Fri Dec 28, 1:23 pm)
Re: TOMOYO Linux Security Goal, Tetsuo Handa, (Sun Dec 30, 1:29 am)
Re: TOMOYO Linux Security Goal, , (Sun Dec 30, 2:28 am)
Re: TOMOYO Linux Security Goal, Casey Schaufler, (Mon Dec 31, 11:27 am)
Re: TOMOYO Linux Security Goal, Pavel Machek, (Sat Dec 29, 8:02 pm)
Re: TOMOYO Linux Security Goal, Serge E. Hallyn, (Fri Dec 28, 11:12 am)
Re: TOMOYO Linux Security Goal, Tetsuo Handa, (Fri Dec 28, 11:43 pm)
Re: TOMOYO Linux Security Goal, Serge E. Hallyn, (Mon Dec 31, 11:17 am)
Re: TOMOYO Linux Security Goal, Tetsuo Handa, (Mon Dec 31, 11:25 am)
Re: TOMOYO Linux Security Goal, Serge E. Hallyn, (Mon Dec 31, 12:17 pm)
speck-geostationary