On Sun, 2 Dec 2007, Oleg Nesterov wrote:It looks clean and sane to me, but I'm currently more worried about 2.6.24, and even the first patch this depends on (coredump/stop race) makes me a bit nervous since all these things tend to have some rather subtle interactions with other parts that depended on the exact semantics of all the signal issues. So my gut feel - considering that none of the problems involved here are exactly new - is that this is good material for early in the 2.6.25 cycle. But I think the whole series looks ok, and if people press me and convince me it's (a) well tested and (b) needed early, then I guess it can be pushed into 2.6.24. Anybody? Linus --
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 006/196] Chinese: add translation of oops-tracing.txt |
| Eric Sandeen | Re: [RFC] Heads up on sys_fallocate() |
| YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / | request_module: runaway loop modprobe net-pf-1 (is Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1) |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 0/37] dccp: Feature negotiation - last call for comments |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Ben Greear | Re: MACVLANs really best solution? How about a bridge with multiple bridge virtual... |
| Rafael J. Wysocki | 2.6.29-rc8: Reported regressions from 2.6.28 |
