Re: [feature] automatically detect hung TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE tasks

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Monday, December 3, 2007 - 3:38 am

* Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote:


maybe: if the user does a Ctrl-C (or a kill -9), the kernel should try 
to honor it, instead of staying there stuck for a very long time 
(possibly forever)?

I think you are somehow confusing two issues: this patch in no way 
declares that "long waits are bad" - if the user _choses_ to wait for 
the NFS server (after phoning IT quickly or whatever), he can wait an 
hour. This patch only declares that "long waits _that the user has no 
way to stop_ are quite likely bad".

Do you see the important distinction between the two cases? Please 
reconsider your position (or re-state it differently), it just makes no 
rational sense to me so far.

	Ingo
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [feature] automatically detect hung TASK_UNINTERRUPTIB ..., Radoslaw Szkodzinski, (Mon Dec 3, 3:15 am)
Re: [feature] automatically detect hung TASK_UNINTERRUPTIB ..., Ingo Molnar, (Mon Dec 3, 3:38 am)
Re: [feature] automatically detect hung TASK_UNINTERRUPTIB ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Mon Dec 3, 11:28 am)