Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...>, Alasdair G Kergon <agk@...>, Greg KH <greg@...>
Date: Thursday, December 27, 2007 - 7:42 am

On Dec 23, 2007 9:39 PM, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:

OK, I debugged this some more. It looks like two bugs meshed together.

One new bug: "do_md_run() returned -22"
I can't seem to start my raid anymore.
The following part of md-allow-devices-to-be-shared-between-md-arrays
adds a new check to do_md_run() (drivers/md/md.c) that fails for my system:
@@ -3213,8 +3283,11 @@ static int do_md_run(mddev_t * mddev)
        /*
         * Analyze all RAID superblock(s)
         */
-       if (!mddev->raid_disks)
+       if (!mddev->raid_disks) {
+               if (!mddev->persistent)
+                       return -EINVAL;
                analyze_sbs(mddev);
+       }

        chunk_size = mddev->chunk_size;

The raid gets started normally with any other kernel I tried.
I did not investigate the cause of this failure further, because I was
looking why a failure to start a raid was causing event/3 to oops.

This looks like a secound, but rather old bug.
do_md_stop (from drivers/md/md.c) does the following:
  3691                  /* make sure all delayed_delete calls have finished */
  3692                  flush_scheduled_work();
  3693
  3694                  export_array(mddev);
  3695
But: Only the callchain export_array -> kick_rdev_from_array ->
unbind_rdev_from_array schedules the delayed_delete's!

After adding a second flush_scheduled_work() below the export_array()
the resulting kernel no longer oopses and my initrd normally asks for
an alternative root-fs, because of the first bug the raid still does
not get started.

I don't know if this flush_scheduled_work() is misplaced since is was
introduced, or if it really even was only trying to flush delayed
deletes from previously stopped arrays.

When investigation this, I got these debug-outputs:
first try, with my second flush_scheduled_work removed again:
[   34.290576] md: Autodetecting RAID arrays.
[   34.125649] md: Scanned 5 and added 5 devices.
[   34.125649] md: autorun ...
[   34.125649] md: considering sdc2 ...
[   34.125658] md:  adding sdc2 ...
[   34.126914] md:  adding sdb2 ...
[   34.128170] md: sdb1 has different UUID to sdc2
[   34.135654] md:  adding sda2 ...
[   34.137168] md: sda1 has different UUID to sdc2
[   34.145669] md: created md1
[   34.146755] md: bind<sda2>
[   34.147879] md: bind<sdb2>
[   34.155665] md: bind<sdc2>
[   34.156730] md: running: <sdc2><sdb2><sda2>
[   34.158427] mddev not persistent ???
[   34.165651] md: do_md_run() returned -22
[   34.167171] md: md1 stopped.
[   34.168292] 1:flush_scheduled_work()
-> this is the original flush_scheduled_work()-call
[   34.175675] md: unbind<sdc2>
[   34.176795] md: remove sysfs-link 'block', schedule delayed_delete...
following output is from unbind_rdev_from_array:
[   34.185662] XXX:unb:rdev == ffff81011ede4800
<3>XXX:unb:rdev->bdev == ffff81011f86b600
<3>XXX:unb:rdev->kobj == ffff81011ede4860
<6>md: export_rdev(sdc2)
[   34.196600] md: unbind<sdb2>
[   34.197720] md: remove sysfs-link 'block', schedule delayed_delete...
[   34.205654] XXX:unb:rdev == ffff81011ede4600
<3>XXX:unb:rdev->bdev == ffff81011f86b080
<3>XXX:unb:rdev->kobj == ffff81011ede4660
<6>md: export_rdev(sdb2)
[   34.217942] md: unbind<sda2>
[   34.225651] md: remove sysfs-link 'block', schedule delayed_delete...
[   34.228140] XXX:unb:rdev == ffff81011ede4400
<3>XXX:unb:rdev->bdev == ffff81011f86a000
<3>XXX:unb:rdev->kobj == ffff81011ede4460
<6>md: export_rdev(sda2)
[   34.245664] 2:!flush_scheduled_work()
-> my second call is disabled for this run
[   34.247101] md: considering sdb1 ...
[   34.248492] md:  adding sdb1 ...
[   34.255654] md:  adding sda1 ...
following output is from delayed_delete:
[   34.257024] XXX:dd:rdev == ffff81011ede4800
<3>XXX:dd:rdev->kobj == ffff81011ede4860
-> sdc2 seems to get deleted normally
<3>XXX:dd:rdev == ffff81011ede4600
<3>XXX:dd:rdev->kobj == ffff81011ede4660
-> sdb2 too
<3>XXX:dd:rdev == ffff81011ede4400
<3>XXX:dd:rdev->bdev == 5441505645440064
-> but here is something strange, the other devices did not get a
bdev-line, because that value was zero
<6>md: created md0
[   34.654554] md: bind<sda1>
[   34.654554] md: bind<sdb1>
[   34.654554] md: running: <sdb1><sda1>
[   34.654554] mddev not persistent ???
[   34.654554] md: do_md_run() returned -22
[   34.654554] md: md0 stopped.
[   34.654554] 1:flush_scheduled_work()
-> the flush from the second failed raid forces the delayed_deletes
from the first raid to finish
[   34.285652] XXX:dd:rdev->kobj == ffff81011ede4460
-> the pointer itself looks still the same, but the kobject seems to be gone:
<1>Unable to handle kernel paging request at 0000000034333545 RIP:
[   34.288794]  [<ffffffff803b49a1>] kref_put+0x31/0x80
[   34.291688] PGD 7e427067 PUD 7ed22067 PMD 0
[   34.293394] Oops: 0002 [1] SMP
[   34.294651] last sysfs file: /sys/devices/virtual/block/md0/dev
[   34.295649] CPU 3
[   34.295649] Modules linked in:
[   34.295649] Pid: 18, comm: events/3 Not tainted 2.6.24-rc6-mm1 #9
[   34.295649] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff803b49a1>]  [<ffffffff803b49a1>]
kref_put+0x31/0x80
[   34.295649] RSP: 0000:ffff81007ffe5df0  EFLAGS: 00010202
[   34.295649] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000034333545 RCX: ffffffff80606270
[   34.295649] RDX: 0000000000000040 RSI: ffffffff803b38b0 RDI: 0000000034333545
[   34.295649] RBP: ffff81007ffe5e00 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000
[   34.295649] R10: ffffffff8094c430 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffffffff803b38b0
[   34.295650] R13: ffff81011ede44d8 R14: ffffffff804d7d50 R15: ffff81011ff210f0
[   34.295650] FS:  0000000002024870(0000) GS:ffff81011ff0dd00(0000)
knlGS:0000000000000000
[   34.295650] CS:  0010 DS: 0018 ES: 0018 CR0: 000000008005003b
[   34.295650] CR2: 0000000034333545 CR3: 000000007e535000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
[   34.295650] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
[   34.295650] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
[   34.295650] Process events/3 (pid: 18, threadinfo ffff81007ffe4000,
task ffff81007ffe2000)
[   34.295650] Stack:  ffff81011ede4460 ffff81011ede4400
ffff81007ffe5e10 ffffffff803b37e9
[   34.295650]  ffff81007ffe5e30 ffffffff803b389b ffffffff804d7d50
ffff81011ede4460
[   34.295650]  ffff81007ffe5e50 ffffffff804d7db9 ffff81011ede44e0
ffff81011ff210c0
[   34.295650] Call Trace:
[   34.295650]  [<ffffffff803b37e9>] kobject_put+0x19/0x20
[   34.295650]  [<ffffffff803b389b>] kobject_del+0x2b/0x40
[   34.295650]  [<ffffffff804d7d50>] delayed_delete+0x0/0xb0
[   34.295650]  [<ffffffff804d7db9>] delayed_delete+0x69/0xb0
[   34.295650]  [<ffffffff80249775>] run_workqueue+0x175/0x210
[   34.295650]  [<ffffffff8024a411>] worker_thread+0x71/0xb0
[   34.295650]  [<ffffffff8024d9e0>] autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x40
[   34.295650]  [<ffffffff8024a3a0>] worker_thread+0x0/0xb0
[   34.295650]  [<ffffffff8024d5fd>] kthread+0x4d/0x80
[   34.295650]  [<ffffffff8020c4b8>] child_rip+0xa/0x12
[   34.295650]  [<ffffffff8020bbcf>] restore_args+0x0/0x30
[   34.295650]  [<ffffffff8024d5b0>] kthread+0x0/0x80
[   34.295650]  [<ffffffff8020c4ae>] child_rip+0x0/0x12
[   34.295650]
[   34.295650]
[   34.295650] Code: f0 ff 0b 0f 94 c0 31 d2 84 c0 74 0b 48 89 df 41
ff d4 ba 01
[   34.295650] RIP  [<ffffffff803b49a1>] kref_put+0x31/0x80
[   34.295650]  RSP <ffff81007ffe5df0>
[   34.295650] CR2: 0000000034333545
[   34.295653] ---[ end trace 60425fedd4d3ef22 ]---
Here the system hangs, the initrd does not prompt for an alternative root-fs

second try with the newly added flush:
[   34.267403] md: Autodetecting RAID arrays.
[   34.188217] md: Scanned 5 and added 5 devices.
[   34.188220] md: autorun ...
[   34.189306] md: considering sdc2 ...
[   34.190699] md:  adding sdc2 ...
[   34.198224] md:  adding sdb2 ...
[   34.199480] md: sdb1 has different UUID to sdc2
[   34.201237] md:  adding sda2 ...
[   34.208220] md: sda1 has different UUID to sdc2
[   34.209993] md: created md1
[   34.218220] md: bind<sda2>
[   34.219341] md: bind<sdb2>
[   34.220410] md: bind<sdc2>
[   34.221476] md: running: <sdc2><sdb2><sda2>
[   34.228963] mddev not persistent ???
[   34.230350] md: do_md_run() returned -22
[   34.238219] md: md1 stopped.
[   34.239339] 1:flush_scheduled_work()
-> old call to flush_scheduled_work()
[   34.240749] md: unbind<sdc2>
[   34.248219] md: remove sysfs-link 'block', schedule delayed_delete...
[   34.250716] XXX:unb:rdev == ffff81011ed6d800
<3>XXX:unb:rdev->bdev == ffff81011f86b600
<3>XXX:unb:rdev->kobj == ffff81011ed6d860
<6>md: export_rdev(sdc2)
[   34.268262] md: unbind<sdb2>
[   34.269382] md: remove sysfs-link 'block', schedule delayed_delete...
[   34.278221] XXX:unb:rdev == ffff81011ed6de00
<3>XXX:unb:rdev->bdev == ffff81011f86b080
<3>XXX:unb:rdev->kobj == ffff81011ed6de60
<6>md: export_rdev(sdb2)
[   34.289123] md: unbind<sda2>
[   34.290244] md: remove sysfs-link 'block', schedule delayed_delete...
[   34.298221] XXX:unb:rdev == ffff81011ed6da00
<3>XXX:unb:rdev->bdev == ffff81011f86a000
<3>XXX:unb:rdev->kobj == ffff81011ed6da60
<6>md: export_rdev(sda2)
[   34.310502] 2:flush_scheduled_work()
-> newly added call to flush_scheduled_work()
[   34.318253] XXX:dd:rdev == ffff81011ed6d800
<3>XXX:dd:rdev->kobj == ffff81011ed6d860
<3>XXX:dd:rdev == ffff81011ed6de00
<3>XXX:dd:rdev->kobj == ffff81011ed6de60
-> this time, rdev->bdev/rdev->kobj from sda2 seem to be still ok.
<3>XXX:dd:rdev == ffff81011ed6da00
<3>XXX:dd:rdev->kobj == ffff81011ed6da60
<6>md: considering sdb1 ...
[   34.339255] md:  adding sdb1 ...
[   34.340511] md:  adding sda1 ...
[   34.348520] md: created md0
[   34.349608] md: bind<sda1>
[   34.350676] md: bind<sdb1>
[   34.351741] md: running: <sdb1><sda1>
[   34.358743] mddev not persistent ???
[   34.360131] md: do_md_run() returned -22
-> same failure to start the second raid, but...
[   34.368219] md: md0 stopped.
[   34.369340] 1:flush_scheduled_work()
-> ... this time the work is already done and no oops happend
[   34.370733] md: unbind<sdb1>
[   34.378219] md: remove sysfs-link 'block', schedule delayed_delete...
[   34.380705] XXX:unb:rdev == ffff81011ed6dc00
<3>XXX:unb:rdev->bdev == ffff81011f86a580
<3>XXX:unb:rdev->kobj == ffff81011ed6dc60
<6>md: export_rdev(sdb1)
[   34.398254] md: unbind<sda1>
[   34.399373] md: remove sysfs-link 'block', schedule delayed_delete...
[   34.408221] XXX:unb:rdev == ffff81007ff51800
<3>XXX:unb:rdev->bdev == ffff81007f8a0580
<3>XXX:unb:rdev->kobj == ffff81007ff51860
<6>md: export_rdev(sda1)
[   34.419120] 2:flush_scheduled_work()
[   34.420510] XXX:dd:rdev == ffff81011ed6dc00
<3>XXX:dd:rdev->kobj == ffff81011ed6dc60
<3>XXX:dd:rdev == ffff81007ff51800
<3>XXX:dd:rdev->kobj == ffff81007ff51860
<6>md: ... autorun DONE.
Here the system now asks for a root-fs as the normal root /dev/md1 was
not started.

I hope these outputs help, if more are needed, just ask.

Torsten
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
2.6.24-rc6-mm1, Andrew Morton, (Sun Dec 23, 3:30 am)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1, Dave Young, (Wed Dec 26, 4:37 am)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1, Torsten Kaiser, (Sun Dec 23, 12:27 pm)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1, Torsten Kaiser, (Fri Dec 28, 6:53 pm)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1, Andrew Morton, (Fri Dec 28, 7:07 pm)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1, Torsten Kaiser, (Sat Dec 29, 12:51 pm)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1, Herbert Xu, (Sat Dec 29, 9:30 pm)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1, Torsten Kaiser, (Sat Dec 29, 11:34 pm)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1, Torsten Kaiser, (Mon Dec 31, 4:15 pm)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1, Herbert Xu, (Tue Jan 1, 8:04 am)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1, Torsten Kaiser, (Wed Jan 2, 2:29 pm)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1, Herbert Xu, (Wed Jan 2, 5:51 pm)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1, Torsten Kaiser, (Fri Jan 4, 6:23 am)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1, Jarek Poplawski, (Fri Jan 4, 9:30 am)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1, Torsten Kaiser, (Fri Jan 4, 11:21 am)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1, Torsten Kaiser, (Fri Jan 4, 5:24 pm)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1, Jarek Poplawski, (Fri Jan 4, 8:07 pm)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1, Torsten Kaiser, (Sat Jan 5, 4:01 am)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1, Jarek Poplawski, (Sat Jan 5, 6:13 am)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1, Torsten Kaiser, (Sat Jan 5, 10:52 am)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1, Torsten Kaiser, (Sat Jan 5, 6:10 pm)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1, Torsten Kaiser, (Sat Jan 5, 11:16 pm)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1, Andrew Morton, (Sat Jan 5, 9:25 pm)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1, FUJITA Tomonori, (Sat Jan 5, 11:28 pm)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1, Torsten Kaiser, (Sun Jan 6, 6:41 am)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1, FUJITA Tomonori, (Sun Jan 6, 7:23 am)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1, Torsten Kaiser, (Sun Jan 6, 7:35 am)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1, FUJITA Tomonori, (Sun Jan 6, 9:33 am)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1, Torsten Kaiser, (Sun Jan 6, 4:03 pm)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1, FUJITA Tomonori, (Mon Jan 7, 2:16 am)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1, Torsten Kaiser, (Fri Jan 25, 5:06 pm)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1, Ingo Molnar, (Tue Jan 8, 11:59 am)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1, FUJITA Tomonori, (Tue Jan 8, 7:57 pm)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1, Jarek Poplawski, (Wed Jan 9, 5:04 am)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1, FUJITA Tomonori, (Wed Jan 9, 8:54 pm)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1, Andrew Morton, (Tue Jan 8, 8:27 pm)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1, FUJITA Tomonori, (Tue Jan 8, 8:54 pm)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1, Andrew Morton, (Tue Jan 8, 9:07 pm)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1, Jarek Poplawski, (Sun Jan 6, 4:27 am)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1, Torsten Kaiser, (Sun Jan 6, 6:30 am)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1, Jarek Poplawski, (Sun Jan 6, 10:52 am)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1, J. Bruce Fields, (Wed Jan 2, 5:57 pm)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1, Torsten Kaiser, (Thu Jan 3, 11:37 am)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1, J. Bruce Fields, (Thu Jan 3, 2:52 pm)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1, Torsten Kaiser, (Thu Jan 3, 1:02 am)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1, Torsten Kaiser, (Tue Jan 1, 8:59 am)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1, Torsten Kaiser, (Tue Jan 1, 2:29 pm)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1, Randy Dunlap, (Sun Dec 30, 1:41 am)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1, J. Bruce Fields, (Sun Dec 30, 5:24 pm)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1, Torsten Kaiser, (Sun Dec 30, 5:35 pm)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1, Torsten Kaiser, (Mon Dec 31, 9:17 am)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1, Andrew Morton, (Sun Dec 23, 4:39 pm)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1, Torsten Kaiser, (Thu Dec 27, 7:42 am)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1, Torsten Kaiser, (Thu Dec 27, 10:30 am)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1 Kernel panics at different functions (), Kamalesh Babulal, (Thu Dec 27, 4:49 am)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1 Kernel panics at different functions (), Kamalesh Babulal, (Fri Dec 28, 5:11 am)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1 Kernel panics at different functions (), Kamalesh Babulal, (Thu Dec 27, 6:25 am)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1 - e1000 breakage, James Morris, (Wed Dec 26, 7:39 pm)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1 (driver core/sysfs), Randy Dunlap, (Mon Dec 31, 4:11 pm)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1 (driver core/sysfs), Greg KH, (Fri Jan 11, 9:05 pm)
[patch] auto-qa Kconfig, Ingo Molnar, (Mon Jan 14, 12:11 pm)
Re: [patch] auto-qa Kconfig, Pavel Machek, (Tue Jan 15, 6:13 pm)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1 (build problem: gpio/W1), Randy Dunlap, (Mon Dec 31, 2:19 pm)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1 (build problem: gpio/W1), Evgeniy Polyakov, (Sat Jan 5, 11:29 am)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1 (build problem: gpio/W1), Ville , (Sat Jan 5, 12:16 pm)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1 (build problem: gpio/W1), Randy Dunlap, (Sat Jan 5, 1:18 pm)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1 (build problem: gpio_keys), Randy Dunlap, (Mon Dec 31, 2:18 pm)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1 (build problem: gpio_keys), David Brownell, (Mon Dec 31, 2:40 pm)
[PATCH -mm] gpio: fix x86 build problem: gpio_keys, Randy Dunlap, (Mon Dec 31, 3:10 pm)
Re: [PATCH -mm] gpio: fix x86 build problem: gpio_keys, Ingo Molnar, (Tue Jan 1, 11:32 am)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1 (build problem: v4l / i2c), Randy Dunlap, (Mon Dec 31, 2:18 pm)
[PATCH -mm] driver core: build with SYSFS=n, Randy Dunlap, (Mon Dec 31, 2:05 pm)
[PATCH -mm] crypto: scatterwalk.h needs sched.h, Randy Dunlap, (Mon Dec 31, 2:05 pm)
Re: [PATCH -mm] crypto: scatterwalk.h needs sched.h, Herbert Xu, (Mon Dec 31, 6:31 pm)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1: __raw_spin_is_contended undefined, Joseph Fannin, (Wed Dec 26, 10:21 pm)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1: __raw_spin_is_contended undefined, Nick Piggin, (Thu Dec 27, 1:21 am)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1: some section mismatches on sparc64, Mariusz Kozlowski, (Wed Dec 26, 8:29 am)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1: some section mismatches on sparc64, David Miller, (Wed Dec 26, 11:05 pm)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1: some section mismatches on sparc64, Adrian Bunk, (Fri Dec 28, 7:22 pm)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1: some section mismatches on sparc64, David Miller, (Sat Dec 29, 4:14 am)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1: some section mismatches on sparc64, Adrian Bunk, (Sat Dec 29, 4:48 am)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1: some section mismatches on sparc64, David Miller, (Sat Dec 29, 4:54 am)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1: some section mismatches on sparc64, Adrian Bunk, (Sat Dec 29, 5:06 am)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1: some section mismatches on sparc64, David Miller, (Sat Dec 29, 5:18 am)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1: some section mismatches on sparc64, Adrian Bunk, (Sat Dec 29, 5:53 am)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1: some section mismatches on sparc64, David Miller, (Sat Dec 29, 5:15 am)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1: some section mismatches on sparc64, David Miller, (Sat Dec 29, 4:27 am)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1, Andreas Mohr, (Tue Dec 25, 5:51 pm)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1: suspend broken on HP nx6325 due to cpufr..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sun Dec 23, 6:54 pm)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1: suspend broken on HP nx6325 due to cpufr..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Mon Dec 24, 10:13 am)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sun Dec 23, 8:35 am)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1, H. Peter Anvin, (Sun Dec 23, 7:09 pm)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1, Ingo Molnar, (Sun Dec 23, 9:00 am)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sun Dec 23, 9:48 am)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sun Dec 23, 9:53 am)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1, Sam Ravnborg, (Sun Dec 23, 4:09 pm)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sun Dec 23, 6:44 pm)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1, Ingo Molnar, (Sun Dec 23, 7:04 am)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1, Ingo Molnar, (Sun Dec 23, 7:10 am)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1, Andrew Morton, (Sun Dec 23, 7:34 am)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1, Ingo Molnar, (Sun Dec 23, 7:57 am)
Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1, Christoph Hellwig, (Sun Dec 23, 8:12 am)