Re: Suspend code ordering (again)

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Alexey Starikovskiy <aystarik@...>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...>, Carlos Corbacho <carlos@...>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...>, Greg KH <gregkh@...>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...>, Len Brown <lenb@...>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, pm list <linux-pm@...>, ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...>
Date: Wednesday, December 26, 2007 - 1:50 pm

Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:

In other words, the 1.x spec is the only thing that matters, at least in 
the short term (*noone* is giving up XP compatibility at this point.)

	-hpa
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: x86: Increase PCIBIOS_MIN_IO to 0x1500 to fix nForce 4 s..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sun Dec 23, 12:30 pm)
Re: x86: Increase PCIBIOS_MIN_IO to 0x1500 to fix nForce 4 s..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sun Dec 23, 6:20 pm)
Re: x86: Increase PCIBIOS_MIN_IO to 0x1500 to fix nForce 4 s..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Mon Dec 24, 9:44 am)
Suspend code ordering (again) (was: Re: x86: Increase PCIBIO..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Tue Dec 25, 12:13 pm)
Re: Suspend code ordering (again) (was: Re: x86: Increase PC..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Wed Dec 26, 11:07 am)
Re: Suspend code ordering (again), Alexey Starikovskiy, (Wed Dec 26, 11:24 am)
Re: Suspend code ordering (again), H. Peter Anvin, (Wed Dec 26, 1:50 pm)