login
Login
/
Register
Search
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2007
»
December
»
26
Re: [x86] is checkpatch.pl broken
view
thread
!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From:
H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...>
To: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>
Subject:
Re: [x86] is checkpatch.pl broken
Date: Wednesday, December 26, 2007 - 1:44 pm
Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
quoted text
> >> > It's a quite true, sorry for this and thanks for the note. And Peter, > the line I marked > is not to be splitted even having additional spaces over math operators. Look > > orig: > mbr_base = (buf_base+sector_size-1) & ~(sector_size-1); > new (could be): > mbr_base = (buf_base + sector_size - 1) & ~(sector_size - 1); > > Is a new version that bad?
Certainly isn't any better. -hpa --
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
[x86] is checkpatch.pl broken
, Cyrill Gorcunov
, (Tue Dec 25, 1:07 pm)
Re: [x86] is checkpatch.pl broken
, H. Peter Anvin
, (Tue Dec 25, 7:48 pm)
Re: [x86] is checkpatch.pl broken
, Cyrill Gorcunov
, (Wed Dec 26, 6:38 am)
Re: [x86] is checkpatch.pl broken
, Ingo Molnar
, (Sun Dec 30, 1:22 pm)
Re: [x86] is checkpatch.pl broken
, Cyrill Gorcunov
, (Sun Dec 30, 4:59 pm)
Re: [x86] is checkpatch.pl broken
, Ingo Molnar
, (Sun Dec 30, 5:08 pm)
Re: [x86] is checkpatch.pl broken
, Cyrill Gorcunov
, (Sun Dec 30, 2:26 pm)
Re: [x86] is checkpatch.pl broken
, H. Peter Anvin
, (Sun Dec 30, 4:27 pm)
Re: [x86] is checkpatch.pl broken
, Cyrill Gorcunov
, (Mon Dec 31, 3:46 am)
Re: [x86] is checkpatch.pl broken
, H. Peter Anvin
, (Wed Dec 26, 1:44 pm)
Re: [x86] is checkpatch.pl broken
, Cyrill Gorcunov
, (Wed Dec 26, 2:15 pm)
Re: [x86] is checkpatch.pl broken
, H. Peter Anvin
, (Tue Dec 25, 7:47 pm)
Navigation
Create content
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
Sunil Naidu
Re: Linux 2.6.20-rc6
Alan Cox
Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
Chris Snook
Re: init's children list is long and slows reaping children.
Greg Kroah-Hartman
[PATCH 001/196] Chinese: Add the known_regression URI to the HOWTO
git
:
openbsd-misc
:
linux-netdev
:
Jarek Poplawski
[PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock().
David Miller
[GIT]: Networking
Gerrit Renker
[PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side)
Eric W. Biederman
Re: [PATCH 10/11] avoid kobject name conflict with different namespaces
Colocation donated by:
Who's online
There are currently
1 user
and
869 guests
online.
Online users
strcmp
Syndicate