Re: x86: Increase PCIBIOS_MIN_IO to 0x1500 to fix nForce 4 suspend-to-RAM

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Sunday, December 23, 2007 - 10:57 am

* Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:


i'm quite nervous about that approach, partly due to the "black magic" 
interaction of commit 2ba84684e8c. Could we try to figure out what's 
really going on here, instead of playing with a general limit (which 
might break other boxes)?

	Ingo
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: x86: Increase PCIBIOS_MIN_IO to 0x1500 to fix nForce 4 ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sun Dec 23, 9:30 am)
Re: x86: Increase PCIBIOS_MIN_IO to 0x1500 to fix nForce 4 ..., Ingo Molnar, (Sun Dec 23, 10:57 am)
Re: x86: Increase PCIBIOS_MIN_IO to 0x1500 to fix nForce 4 ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sun Dec 23, 3:20 pm)
Re: x86: Increase PCIBIOS_MIN_IO to 0x1500 to fix nForce 4 ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Mon Dec 24, 6:44 am)
Re: Suspend code ordering (again) (was: Re: x86: Increase ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Wed Dec 26, 8:07 am)
Re: Suspend code ordering (again), Alexey Starikovskiy, (Wed Dec 26, 8:24 am)