On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 01:11:24PM +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:I agree that we probably want something like this. As do some others, so we already had a few a few attempts at similar things. The first one is from SGI and called PAGG (http://oss.sgi.com/projects/pagg/) and also includes allocating per-task data for it's users. Then also from SGI there has been a simplified version called pnotify that's also available from the website above. Later Matt Helsley had something called "Task Watchers" which lwn has an article on: http://lwn.net/Articles/208117/. For some reason neither ever made a lot of progess (performance problems?). As said by other we really should have a register/unregister API instead of exposing the implementation. Also please don't export anything until we actuall grow modular users in the tree. --
| Dave Hansen | [RFC][PATCH 0/4] kernel-based checkpoint restart |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Bart Van Assche | Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| Eric Paris | [RFC 0/5] [TALPA] Intro to a linux interface for on access scanning |
git: | |
| David Miller | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Natalie Protasevich | [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
