Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...>, Christoph Lameter <clameter@...>, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...>, LKML <linux-kernel@...>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...>, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...>
Well, I do have to admit that I'm not a huge fan of /proc/slabinfo, and
the fact that there hasn't been a lot of complaints about it going away
does seem to imply that it wasn't a very important ABI.
I'm the first to stand up for backwards compatibility, but I also try to
be realistic, and so far nobody has really complained about the fact that
/proc/slabinfo went away on any grounds but on the general principle of
"it was a user-visible ABI".
We've changed user-visible ABI's in the past in the hope that they weren't
actually used. Sometimes it worked, sometimes it didn't. In this case, I
think it still has the potential of working.
That said, I'm not a *huge* fan of /sys/slab/ either. I can get the info I
as a developer tend to want from there, but it's really rather less
convenient than I'd like. It is really quite hard, for example, to get any
kind of "who actually uses the most *memory*" information out of there.
You have to use something like this:
for i in *
do
order=$(cat "$i/order")
slabs=$(cat "$i/slabs")
object_size=$(cat "$i/object_size")
objects=$(cat "$i/objects")
truesize=$(( $slabs<<($order+12) ))
size=$(( $object_size*$objects ))
percent=$(( $truesize/100 ))
if [ $percent -gt 0 ]; then
percent=$(( $size / $percent ))
fi
mb=$(( $size >> 10 ))
printf "%10d MB %3d %s\n" $mb $percent $i
done | sort -n | tail
which works fine, but while it's actually _much_ more readable than doing
the same thing with /proc/slabinfo was, I worry about the lack of
atomicity in getting the statistics.
I dunno. I do think /sys/slab/ is a better interface than /proc/slabinfo
was. I just wonder if it could be better still.
Linus
--
