> On Fri, 2007-12-21 at 14:30 -0500, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
>> On 12/19/2007 03:48 AM, Filippos Papadopoulos wrote:
>>> On Dec 17, 2007 2:18 PM, Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com> wrote:
>>>> I have found one problem. Please try patch [2] below and report.
>>>> If it still fails try to enable debugging by setting with patch [1]
>>>> these values at top of drivers/scsi/initio.c. And send dmsgs.
>>>>
>>>> Boaz
>>>>
>>>
>>> I tried patch[2] (addition of sg++) at 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 but the
>>> system hangs after some seconds when the initio driver loads.
>>> I will try patch[1] next week to see what happens.
>>>
>>> Would it be better to open a bug report at bugzilla?
>>>
>> There is also a Fedora bug report against 2.6.23. The user has
>> applied commit e9e42faf47255274a1ed0b9bf1c46118023ec5fa from
>> 2.6.24-rc plus the two additional fixes under discussion and it
>> hangs for him too.
>>
>>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=390531
>
> It really sounds like there's some problem applying the patches. The
> consistent report throughout is this one:
>
> initio: I/O port range 0x0 is busy.
>
> Which should be fixed by 99f1f534922a2f2251ba05b14657a1c62882a80e. I
> didn't actually find that in the bug thread anywhere, but maybe I missed
> it?
>
