On Tuesday 18 December 2007 10:59:18 am Jean Delvare wrote:I suspect the manufacturers would say "Oh, the sensors? The BIOS isn't broken, you're just supposed to use WMI or some (undocumented) ACPI device to get at those." I know next to nothing about WMI, and there are probably IP issues in that area. But I'd rather spend effort in figuring out the "right" way to do this. Until we do it the same way as Windows, we can pile on hacks till the cows come home, and we'll still have issues. I added Carlos to the cc: list because he's been doing a lot of interesting-looking work on WMI. Windows apparently doesn't reject those resource declarations, so I'm a bit hesitant to do it in Linux. That tends to cover up problems, and then it becomes very difficult to remove the band-aid and figure out a correct fix in the future. Bjorn --
| Jan Engelhardt | intel iommu (Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23) |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 001/196] Chinese: Add the known_regression URI to the HOWTO |
| Linus Torvalds | Linux 2.6.25-rc4 |
| Jon Smirl | Re: 463 kernel developers missing! |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: HTB accuracy for high speed |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
