Re: [PATCH 3/3] net: wireless: bcm43xx: big_buffer_sem semaphore to mutex

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...>
Cc: <bcm43xx-dev@...>, Michael Buesch <mb@...>, Daniel Walker <dwalker@...>, Ray Lee <ray-lk@...>, Simon Holm <odie@...>, <matthias.kaehlcke@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <linux@...>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>, <kjwinchester@...>, <jonathan@...>, <akpm@...>
Date: Sunday, December 16, 2007 - 10:18 am

> > On Sun, 2007-12-16 at 00:27 +0100, Michael Buesch wrote:
" cards that
 both.

I should probably mention though that of course it is (in theory!)
possible that the card works better with bcm43xx, it just never has
happened for all I know.

johannes
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH 3/3] net: wireless: bcm43xx: big_buffer_sem semap..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Fri Dec 14, 8:51 pm)
Re: [PATCH 3/3] net: wireless: bcm43xx: big_buffer_sem semap..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sat Dec 15, 7:18 pm)
Re: [PATCH 3/3] net: wireless: bcm43xx: big_buffer_sem semap..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sun Dec 16, 10:35 am)
Re: [PATCH 3/3] net: wireless: bcm43xx: big_buffer_sem semap..., Johannes Berg, (Sun Dec 16, 10:18 am)
Re: [PATCH 3/3] net: wireless: bcm43xx: big_buffer_sem semap..., John W. Linville, (Fri Dec 14, 10:14 am)
Re: [PATCH 3/3] net: wireless: bcm43xx: big_buffer_sem semap..., John W. Linville, (Thu Dec 13, 10:23 am)