Re: [PATCH 3/3] net: wireless: bcm43xx: big_buffer_sem semaphore to mutex

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Michael Buesch <mb@...>
Cc: <bcm43xx-dev@...>, Daniel Walker <dwalker@...>, <akpm@...>, Ray Lee <ray-lk@...>, Simon Holm Thøgersen <odie@...>, <matthias.kaehlcke@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <jonathan@...>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>, <kjwinchester@...>, <linux@...>
Date: Saturday, December 15, 2007 - 10:30 pm

Michael Buesch wrote:

The BCM4311/1 card used to work better with bcm43xx than it did with b43; however, since the power 
control problem was "solved" in b43, there is very little difference. When I built my special system 
to use the BCM4311 with b43legacy, there was no difference.

I don't know of any cards that work better with bcm43xx than with b43. Of course, that is comparing 
SoftMAC with mac80211. There is, of course, no comparison.

Larry


--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH 3/3] net: wireless: bcm43xx: big_buffer_sem semap..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Fri Dec 14, 8:51 pm)
Re: [PATCH 3/3] net: wireless: bcm43xx: big_buffer_sem semap..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sat Dec 15, 7:18 pm)
Re: [PATCH 3/3] net: wireless: bcm43xx: big_buffer_sem semap..., Larry Finger, (Sat Dec 15, 10:30 pm)
Re: [PATCH 3/3] net: wireless: bcm43xx: big_buffer_sem semap..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sun Dec 16, 10:35 am)
Re: [PATCH 3/3] net: wireless: bcm43xx: big_buffer_sem semap..., John W. Linville, (Fri Dec 14, 10:14 am)
Re: [PATCH 3/3] net: wireless: bcm43xx: big_buffer_sem semap..., John W. Linville, (Thu Dec 13, 10:23 am)