Re: [PATCH 3/3] net: wireless: bcm43xx: big_buffer_sem semaphore to mutex

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Michael Buesch <mb@...>
Cc: <bcm43xx-dev@...>, Simon Holm <odie@...>, Daniel Walker <dwalker@...>, <akpm@...>, Ray Lee <ray-lk@...>, <matthias.kaehlcke@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <linux@...>, <kjwinchester@...>, <jonathan@...>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>
Date: Saturday, December 15, 2007 - 7:18 pm

On Saturday, 15 of December 2007, Michael Buesch wrote:

I see, thanks.


This is reasonable, yes.


Well, the only problem with that is I suspect there are some "newer" cards that
work better with v3 firmware, although they are supposed to support both.

Greetings,
Rafael
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH 3/3] net: wireless: bcm43xx: big_buffer_sem semap..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Fri Dec 14, 8:51 pm)
Re: [PATCH 3/3] net: wireless: bcm43xx: big_buffer_sem semap..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sat Dec 15, 7:18 pm)
Re: [PATCH 3/3] net: wireless: bcm43xx: big_buffer_sem semap..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sun Dec 16, 10:35 am)
Re: [PATCH 3/3] net: wireless: bcm43xx: big_buffer_sem semap..., John W. Linville, (Fri Dec 14, 10:14 am)
Re: [PATCH 3/3] net: wireless: bcm43xx: big_buffer_sem semap..., John W. Linville, (Thu Dec 13, 10:23 am)