Re: Top kernel oopses/warnings this week

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...>, <protasnb@...>
Date: Saturday, December 15, 2007 - 11:49 am

Arjan van de Ven wrote:

A few comments:

Report counts may be too high due to duplicate recognition of the very
same report.¹

Reports against 2.6.X-rcY-mmZ are listed in the same category as reports
against 2.6.X-rcY.  To distinguish -mm reports from vanilla reports, one
has to look into the details of each bug entry.¹

A general weakness is that it is ultimately impossible to know whether a
report was against an unpatched kernel, unless one drills down to the
individual mailinglist threads.

Reports about tainted kernels have arguably less value.  It would be
good to hide such reports until a report of the same oops in an
untainted kernel was found.

¹) example: http://www.kerneloops.org/oops.php?number=2335
-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-=-=== ==-- -====
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Top kernel oopses/warnings this week, Arjan van de Ven, (Fri Dec 14, 2:46 pm)
Re: Top kernel oopses/warnings this week, Stefan Richter, (Sat Dec 15, 11:49 am)
Re: Top kernel oopses/warnings this week, Arjan van de Ven, (Sat Dec 15, 2:21 pm)
Re: Top kernel oopses/warnings this week, Stefan Richter, (Sat Dec 15, 3:44 pm)
Re: Top kernel oopses/warnings this week, Jon Masters, (Fri Dec 14, 6:12 pm)
Re: Top kernel oopses/warnings this week, Andrew Morton, (Fri Dec 14, 5:57 pm)
Re: Top kernel oopses/warnings this week, Arjan van de Ven, (Fri Dec 14, 8:38 pm)
Re: Top kernel oopses/warnings this week, Natalie Protasevich, (Fri Dec 14, 6:25 pm)
Re: Top kernel oopses/warnings this week, Dave Jones, (Fri Dec 14, 2:58 pm)