Re: [PATCH 3/3] net: wireless: bcm43xx: big_buffer_sem semaphore to mutex

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...>
Cc: Michael Buesch <mb@...>, Daniel Walker <dwalker@...>, Ray Lee <ray-lk@...>, Simon Holm Thøgersen <odie@...>, <matthias.kaehlcke@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <linux@...>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>, <kjwinchester@...>, <jonathan@...>, <akpm@...>, <bcm43xx-dev@...>
Date: Friday, December 14, 2007 - 8:58 pm

Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

I will be very interested in Michael's answer to this question; however, my experience is that it 
doesn't make much difference if your device is supported by both V3 and V4 firmware. This impression 
was obtained by comparing BCM4318 and BCM4311/1 devices with b43 and b43legacy.

Note that 802.11b and early BCM4306 devices are not supported by V4 firmware. Similarly, with 
BCM4311/2 and newer devices V3 firmware fails. As Michael said "newer drivers supporting newer 
hardware need newer firmware".

Larry
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH 3/3] net: wireless: bcm43xx: big_buffer_sem semap..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Fri Dec 14, 8:51 pm)
Re: [PATCH 3/3] net: wireless: bcm43xx: big_buffer_sem semap..., Larry Finger, (Fri Dec 14, 8:58 pm)
Re: [PATCH 3/3] net: wireless: bcm43xx: big_buffer_sem semap..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sat Dec 15, 7:18 pm)
Re: [PATCH 3/3] net: wireless: bcm43xx: big_buffer_sem semap..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sun Dec 16, 10:35 am)
Re: [PATCH 3/3] net: wireless: bcm43xx: big_buffer_sem semap..., John W. Linville, (Fri Dec 14, 10:14 am)
Re: [PATCH 3/3] net: wireless: bcm43xx: big_buffer_sem semap..., John W. Linville, (Thu Dec 13, 10:23 am)