login
Login
/
Register
Search
Search this site:
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2007
»
December
»
14
Re: More info on port 80 symptoms on MCP51 machine.
view
thread
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From: Chuck Ebbert
Subject:
Re: More info on port 80 symptoms on MCP51 machine.
Date: Friday, December 14, 2007 - 3:05 pm
On 12/12/2007 04:05 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
quoted text
> Rene Herman wrote: >> On 12-12-07 21:26, Rene Herman wrote: >> >>> On 12-12-07 21:07, David P. Reed wrote: >> >>>> Someone might have an in to nVidia to clarify this, since I don't. >>>> In any case, the udelay(2) approach seems to be a safe fix for this >>>> machine. >> >> By the way, _does_ anyone have a contact at nVidia who could clarify? >> Alan maybe? I'm quite curious what they did... >> >> Summary: >> >> Unless after booting with "acpi=off", outputs to port 0x80 (the legacy >> way to delay I/O) reliably, but not immediately, hang MCP51 machines. >> Outputs to port 0xed do not indicating it's a not a generic bus abort >> problem. >> > > Sorry, the first sentence didn't parse unambiguously for me. Do you > mean "acpi=off" works, or that "acpi=off" allows *subsequent* boots to > work? > > I have some people at nVidia I can probably ping. >
Have them search on Google for: hp tx1000 noapic :) --
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Pavel Machek
, (Wed Dec 5, 4:10 am)
RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern AMD ...
, David P. Reed
, (Thu Dec 6, 3:38 pm)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Alan Cox
, (Thu Dec 6, 5:15 pm)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Andi Kleen
, (Fri Dec 7, 3:44 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, David P. Reed
, (Fri Dec 7, 7:50 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Andi Kleen
, (Fri Dec 7, 7:54 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Rene Herman
, (Fri Dec 7, 8:43 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Alan Cox
, (Fri Dec 7, 9:04 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Rene Herman
, (Fri Dec 7, 9:28 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Andi Kleen
, (Fri Dec 7, 9:31 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Alan Cox
, (Fri Dec 7, 10:19 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Alan Cox
, (Fri Dec 7, 11:42 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Rene Herman
, (Fri Dec 7, 11:45 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Rene Herman
, (Fri Dec 7, 12:25 pm)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Alan Cox
, (Fri Dec 7, 2:45 pm)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Andi Kleen
, (Fri Dec 7, 5:21 pm)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, David P. Reed
, (Sat Dec 8, 12:25 pm)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Andi Kleen
, (Sat Dec 8, 12:50 pm)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Alan Cox
, (Sat Dec 8, 1:26 pm)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, David P. Reed
, (Sat Dec 8, 1:47 pm)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Alan Cox
, (Sat Dec 8, 2:04 pm)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Rene Herman
, (Sat Dec 8, 10:04 pm)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Pavel Machek
, (Sun Dec 9, 5:54 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Pavel Machek
, (Sun Dec 9, 6:22 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Dr. David Alan Gilbert
, (Sun Dec 9, 6:41 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Ondrej Zary
, (Sun Dec 9, 8:54 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Andi Kleen
, (Sun Dec 9, 9:59 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Pavel Machek
, (Sun Dec 9, 2:25 pm)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Alan Cox
, (Sun Dec 9, 3:29 pm)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Pavel Machek
, (Sun Dec 9, 4:22 pm)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Rene Herman
, (Sun Dec 9, 9:17 pm)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Krzysztof Halasa
, (Mon Dec 10, 4:30 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Alan Cox
, (Mon Dec 10, 5:02 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Rene Herman
, (Mon Dec 10, 5:08 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Ondrej Zary
, (Mon Dec 10, 11:02 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, H. Peter Anvin
, (Mon Dec 10, 5:31 pm)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, David Newall
, (Mon Dec 10, 6:10 pm)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, H. Peter Anvin
, (Mon Dec 10, 6:25 pm)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, David Newall
, (Mon Dec 10, 6:42 pm)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, H. Peter Anvin
, (Mon Dec 10, 6:46 pm)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, H. Peter Anvin
, (Mon Dec 10, 6:51 pm)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, H. Peter Anvin
, (Mon Dec 10, 10:53 pm)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, H. Peter Anvin
, (Mon Dec 10, 10:58 pm)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Rene Herman
, (Mon Dec 10, 11:54 pm)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Paul Rolland
, (Tue Dec 11, 12:40 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, David Newall
, (Tue Dec 11, 5:08 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Alan Cox
, (Tue Dec 11, 6:14 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Rene Herman
, (Tue Dec 11, 6:16 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Paul Rolland
, (Tue Dec 11, 6:32 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Andi Kleen
, (Tue Dec 11, 6:32 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Pavel Machek
, (Tue Dec 11, 6:47 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Andi Kleen
, (Tue Dec 11, 6:50 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, David Newall
, (Tue Dec 11, 6:50 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Rene Herman
, (Tue Dec 11, 7:15 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Alan Cox
, (Tue Dec 11, 7:25 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Lennart Sorensen
, (Tue Dec 11, 8:14 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Rene Herman
, (Tue Dec 11, 8:28 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Paul Rolland
, (Tue Dec 11, 8:37 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, linux-os (Dick Johnson)
, (Tue Dec 11, 8:41 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Rene Herman
, (Tue Dec 11, 8:53 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Andi Kleen
, (Tue Dec 11, 9:30 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Rene Herman
, (Tue Dec 11, 9:40 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Rene Herman
, (Tue Dec 11, 9:50 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, David P. Reed
, (Tue Dec 11, 9:58 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, David P. Reed
, (Tue Dec 11, 10:00 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, H. Peter Anvin
, (Tue Dec 11, 10:01 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Rene Herman
, (Tue Dec 11, 10:04 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, H. Peter Anvin
, (Tue Dec 11, 10:05 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Rene Herman
, (Tue Dec 11, 10:27 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Alan Cox
, (Tue Dec 11, 10:32 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Pavel Machek
, (Tue Dec 11, 12:16 pm)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Pavel Machek
, (Tue Dec 11, 12:18 pm)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, David P. Reed
, (Tue Dec 11, 12:19 pm)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Pavel Machek
, (Tue Dec 11, 12:36 pm)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Rene Herman
, (Tue Dec 11, 12:59 pm)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Rene Herman
, (Tue Dec 11, 12:59 pm)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Rene Herman
, (Tue Dec 11, 1:00 pm)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Alan Cox
, (Tue Dec 11, 1:16 pm)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, linux-os (Dick Johnson)
, (Tue Dec 11, 1:27 pm)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Rene Herman
, (Tue Dec 11, 1:34 pm)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, David P. Reed
, (Tue Dec 11, 4:56 pm)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, linux-os (Dick Johnson)
, (Wed Dec 12, 6:11 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Alan Cox
, (Wed Dec 12, 9:12 am)
More info on port 80 symptoms on MCP51 machine.
, David P. Reed
, (Wed Dec 12, 1:07 pm)
Re: More info on port 80 symptoms on MCP51 machine.
, Rene Herman
, (Wed Dec 12, 1:26 pm)
Re: Attitude problems.
, linux-os (Dick Johnson)
, (Wed Dec 12, 1:31 pm)
Re: More info on port 80 symptoms on MCP51 machine.
, David P. Reed
, (Wed Dec 12, 1:37 pm)
Re: More info on port 80 symptoms on MCP51 machine.
, Alan Cox
, (Wed Dec 12, 2:01 pm)
Re: More info on port 80 symptoms on MCP51 machine.
, H. Peter Anvin
, (Wed Dec 12, 2:05 pm)
Re: More info on port 80 symptoms on MCP51 machine.
, Alan Cox
, (Wed Dec 12, 2:29 pm)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, David Newall
, (Wed Dec 12, 3:18 pm)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Alan Cox
, (Wed Dec 12, 4:00 pm)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, Alan Cox
, (Thu Dec 13, 6:21 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern ...
, David P. Reed
, (Thu Dec 13, 6:50 pm)
Re: Attitude problems.
, linux-os (Dick Johnson)
, (Fri Dec 14, 9:01 am)
Re: More info on port 80 symptoms on MCP51 machine.
, Chuck Ebbert
, (Fri Dec 14, 3:05 pm)
Re: More info on port 80 symptoms on MCP51 machine.
, Rene Herman
, (Sat Dec 15, 12:22 am)
RE: More info on port 80 symptoms on MCP51 machine.
, Allen Martin
, (Sat Dec 15, 3:34 pm)
Re: More info on port 80 symptoms on MCP51 machine.
, H. Peter Anvin
, (Sat Dec 15, 3:46 pm)
Navigation
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
monstr
[PATCH 46/56] microblaze_v2: headers files entry.h current.h mman.h registers.h se...
Ingo Molnar
Re: 2.6.20-rc6-mm3
Jan Engelhardt
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface)
Dave Jones
Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?
Michael Moore
Re: underage models, pre teen models, lolita porn, young preteens, little lolitas
git
:
Andy Parkins
git-fetch fails with error code 128
Eli Zaretskii
Re: Switching from CVS to GIT
Dan Chokola
Re: how do you "force a pull"?
Johan Herland
Re: Comment on weak refs
Matthieu Moy
Re: git pull (Your local changes to ... would be overwritten by merge)
git-commits-head
:
Linux Kernel Mailing List
No need to do lock_super() for exclusion in generic_shutdown_super()
Linux Kernel Mailing List
x86, msr: Export the register-setting MSR functions via /dev/*/msr
Linux Kernel Mailing List
MIPS: SMTC: Fix lockup in smtc_distribute_timer
Linux Kernel Mailing List
Input: gpio-keys - add support for disabling gpios through sysfs
Linux Kernel Mailing List
mac80211: check if HT40+/- is allowed before sending assoc
linux-netdev
:
Patrick McHardy
Re: no reassembly for outgoing packets on RAW socket
Eric Dumazet
Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6] net: speedup udp receive path
Patrick McHardy
[NET_SCHED]: sch_ingress: remove netfilter support
David Miller
Re: [PATCH net-2.6.25] [IPVS] Added include for ip_vs.h for ctl_path (build was br...
Eric Dumazet
[PATCH] tc: Fix unitialized kernel memory leak
openbsd-misc
:
elitdostlar
Seks partneri arayan bayanlar bu adreste - 8878xs706x6438
Marcus Andree
Re: This is what Linus Torvalds calls openBSD crowd
Lars D. Noodén
Re: sshd.config and AllowUsers
Henning Brauer
Re: Sun Blade 1000?
Brian Keefer
Re: bind 9.x DoS
Colocation donated by:
Syndicate