Re: [PATCH] Option to disable AMD C1E (allows dynticks to work)

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...>, Eduard-Gabriel Munteanu <eduard.munteanu@...>, LKML <linux-kernel@...>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>
Date: Friday, December 14, 2007 - 4:06 pm

> Well, that would interfere with the acpi-idle code.

How so? idle notifiers should work for acpi idle too.


The original use cases were: 
- Accounting for idle time with stopped counters in oprofile and eliminate
the need for idle=poll.
That never was implemented unfortunately but would be still a worthy
feature I think.
- Perfmon for similar uses.
- noidletick -- my original noidletick implementation used the idle
notifiers similar to the s390 implementation. Obsolete now. 

Right now it is used for the machine check early notification, but I never
liked that (imho it just "fixes" a non problem only relevant 
in non realistic testing situations) and it would be fine to drop that one 
I think.  In fact I already made it a config in the patchkit to use the 64bit
mce code on 32bit too.

-Andi

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH] Option to disable AMD C1E (allows dynticks to wo..., Andi Kleen, (Fri Dec 14, 4:06 pm)