Re: RFC: remove __read_mostly

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...>, <linux-arch@...>
Date: Thursday, December 13, 2007 - 6:29 pm

Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org> writes:

File sizes are useless -- check size output.


What optimizations do you think it prevents?  I don't think it 
should change the gcc generated code at all; the only difference
should be to the linker.

-Andi

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
RFC: remove __read_mostly, Adrian Bunk, (Thu Dec 13, 6:20 pm)
Re: RFC: remove __read_mostly, Matt Mackall, (Fri Dec 14, 11:24 am)
Re: RFC: remove __read_mostly, Eric Dumazet, (Fri Dec 14, 11:38 am)
Re: RFC: remove __read_mostly, Matt Mackall, (Fri Dec 14, 11:42 am)
Re: RFC: remove __read_mostly, Kyle McMartin, (Thu Dec 13, 7:54 pm)
Re: RFC: remove __read_mostly, Andi Kleen, (Thu Dec 13, 8:33 pm)
Re: RFC: remove __read_mostly, Eric Dumazet, (Thu Dec 13, 6:48 pm)
Re: RFC: remove __read_mostly, Adrian Bunk, (Thu Dec 13, 7:00 pm)
Re: RFC: remove __read_mostly, David Miller, (Thu Dec 13, 6:32 pm)
Re: RFC: remove __read_mostly, Harvey Harrison, (Thu Dec 13, 6:44 pm)
Re: RFC: remove __read_mostly, Andi Kleen, (Thu Dec 13, 7:06 pm)
Re: RFC: remove __read_mostly, Andi Kleen, (Thu Dec 13, 6:29 pm)
Re: RFC: remove __read_mostly, Adrian Bunk, (Thu Dec 13, 6:41 pm)
Re: RFC: remove __read_mostly, Arnd Bergmann, (Fri Dec 14, 12:16 pm)
Re: RFC: remove __read_mostly, Eric Dumazet, (Fri Dec 14, 12:31 pm)