On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 12:43:34PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:I think this just leaves us with deciding on a mechanism for how to do single-application quirks. I take Andi's point that adding a flag set to the quirk data structure is a fine solution, but I'm really ok with static integers in individual functions. Do we have consensus on how to handle that? I'm happy either way, but I'd rather have agreement on how to handle it before I post another iteration of this patch. Thanks & Regards Neil -- /*************************************************** *Neil Horman *nhorman@tuxdriver.com *gpg keyid: 1024D / 0x92A74FA1 *http://pgp.mit.edu ***************************************************/ --
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 006/196] Chinese: add translation of oops-tracing.txt |
| Eric Sandeen | Re: [RFC] Heads up on sys_fallocate() |
| YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / | request_module: runaway loop modprobe net-pf-1 (is Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1) |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 0/37] dccp: Feature negotiation - last call for comments |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Ben Greear | Re: MACVLANs really best solution? How about a bridge with multiple bridge virtual... |
| Rafael J. Wysocki | 2.6.29-rc8: Reported regressions from 2.6.28 |
