On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 12:43:34PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:I think this just leaves us with deciding on a mechanism for how to do single-application quirks. I take Andi's point that adding a flag set to the quirk data structure is a fine solution, but I'm really ok with static integers in individual functions. Do we have consensus on how to handle that? I'm happy either way, but I'd rather have agreement on how to handle it before I post another iteration of this patch. Thanks & Regards Neil -- /*************************************************** *Neil Horman *nhorman@tuxdriver.com *gpg keyid: 1024D / 0x92A74FA1 *http://pgp.mit.edu ***************************************************/ --
| Adrian Bunk | Re: Linux 2.6.21 |
| Linus Torvalds | Linux 2.6.21-rc2 |
| WANG Cong | [-mm Patch] UML: fix a building error |
| Roland McGrath | Re: [PATCH 0/5] ftrace: to kill a daemon |
git: | |
| Natalie Protasevich | [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Patrick McHardy | Re: [PATCH] netfilter: use per-cpu spinlock rather than RCU (v3) |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Theodore Ts'o | Re: cc1 fails silently |
| Michael Nolan | Power routines on notebook cause kernel panic |
| Marc Peters | v 0.11 boot disk problem |
| Dave `geek' Gymer | WARNING (was Re: New afio release) |
