On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 03:21:32PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:I'm not sure that would be fine. In the situation you describe, not setting this bit means the second core won't receive interrupts. If we crash on that core and boot the kdump kernel with it, we get exactly the same problem that we currently see. I suppose I can, but I'm not sure what benefit that provides. Can you elaborate? I can fix that up. I'll hold off though until ben redoes all his testing. He mentioned earlier this morning, that some of the results he was getting may have been caused by a kexec utility bug. He's re-confirming that this patch solves the reported problem. Once he does, I'll repost. Thanks & Regards Neil -- /*************************************************** *Neil Horman *nhorman@tuxdriver.com *gpg keyid: 1024D / 0x92A74FA1 *http://pgp.mit.edu ***************************************************/ --
| Heiko Carstens | [patch -mm] s390: struct bin_attribute changes |
| Andrew Morton | 2.6.25-rc2-mm1 |
| Eric W. Biederman | Re: [PATCH] kexec: force x86_64 arches to boot kdump kernels on boot cpu |
| Jan Engelhardt | intel iommu (Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23) |
git: | |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Jens Axboe | Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
| Andrew Morton | Re: [PATCH] PHYLIB: IRQ event workqueue handling fixes |
