Re: Performance overhead of get_cycles_sync

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Andi Kleen <ak@...>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...>, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...>, <dor.laor@...>, kvm-devel <kvm-devel@...>
Date: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 - 4:29 pm

* Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:


but you are right that it's not turned off on all core2's, so my patch 
is wrong for them.

	Ingo
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: Performance overhead of get_cycles_sync, Ingo Molnar, (Tue Dec 11, 10:27 am)
Re: [kvm-devel] Performance overhead of get_cycles_sync, Joerg Roedel, (Tue Dec 11, 5:26 pm)
Re: Performance overhead of get_cycles_sync, Arjan van de Ven, (Tue Dec 11, 12:35 pm)
Re: Performance overhead of get_cycles_sync, Ingo Molnar, (Tue Dec 11, 1:03 pm)
Re: Performance overhead of get_cycles_sync, Andi Kleen, (Tue Dec 11, 1:23 pm)
Re: Performance overhead of get_cycles_sync, Ingo Molnar, (Tue Dec 11, 4:19 pm)
Re: Performance overhead of get_cycles_sync, Ingo Molnar, (Tue Dec 11, 4:29 pm)
Re: Performance overhead of get_cycles_sync, Dor Laor, (Tue Dec 11, 11:03 am)