login
Header Space

 
 

Re: Performance overhead of get_cycles_sync

Score:
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <mingo@...>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 - 1:23 pm

Ingo Molnar <mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org> writes:


Which is not on core2 which was the question about. And if it was
turned off it wouldn't use get_cycles_sync() at all.

-Andi
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: Performance overhead of get_cycles_sync, Ingo Molnar, (Tue Dec 11, 10:27 am)
Re: [kvm-devel] Performance overhead of get_cycles_sync, Joerg Roedel, (Tue Dec 11, 5:26 pm)
Re: Performance overhead of get_cycles_sync, Arjan van de Ven, (Tue Dec 11, 12:35 pm)
Re: Performance overhead of get_cycles_sync, Ingo Molnar, (Tue Dec 11, 1:03 pm)
Re: Performance overhead of get_cycles_sync, Andi Kleen, (Tue Dec 11, 1:23 pm)
Re: Performance overhead of get_cycles_sync, Ingo Molnar, (Tue Dec 11, 4:19 pm)
Re: Performance overhead of get_cycles_sync, Ingo Molnar, (Tue Dec 11, 4:29 pm)
Re: Performance overhead of get_cycles_sync, Dor Laor, (Tue Dec 11, 11:03 am)
speck-geostationary