On 11-12-07 17:30, Andi Kleen wrote:

quoted text
> Anyways it looks like the discussion here is going in a
> a loop. I had hoped David would post his test results with
> another port so that we know for sure that the bus aborts 
> (and not port 80) is the problem on his box. But it looks like
> he doesn't want to do this. Still removing the bus aborts
> is probably the correct way to go forward.

Yes, I do also still want to know that. David (Reed)?

quoted text
> Only needs a patch now. If nobody beats me to it i'll
> add one later to my tree.

Pavel Machek already posted one. His udelay(8) wants to be less -- 1 or "to 
be safe" perhaps 2.

http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/12/9/131

Rene.
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/