Home » Mailing list archives » linux-kernel » 2007 » December » 11

Re: Performance overhead of get_cycles_sync

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
[view in full thread]
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>
Cc: <dor.laor@...>, <tglx@...>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...>, kvm-devel <kvm-devel@...>
Subject: Re: Performance overhead of get_cycles_sync
Date: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 - 12:35 pm

On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 15:27:17 +0100
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:


isn't this probably wrong since this code is also used in the vsyscall code..
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
Re: Performance overhead of get_cycles_sync, Ingo Molnar, (Tue Dec 11, 10:27 am)
Re: [kvm-devel] Performance overhead of get_cycles_sync, Joerg Roedel, (Tue Dec 11, 5:26 pm)
Re: Performance overhead of get_cycles_sync, Arjan van de Ven, (Tue Dec 11, 12:35 pm)
Re: Performance overhead of get_cycles_sync, Ingo Molnar, (Tue Dec 11, 1:03 pm)
Re: Performance overhead of get_cycles_sync, Andi Kleen, (Tue Dec 11, 1:23 pm)
Re: Performance overhead of get_cycles_sync, Ingo Molnar, (Tue Dec 11, 4:19 pm)
Re: Performance overhead of get_cycles_sync, Ingo Molnar, (Tue Dec 11, 4:29 pm)
Re: Performance overhead of get_cycles_sync, Dor Laor, (Tue Dec 11, 11:03 am)