On 11-12-07 16:37, Paul Rolland wrote: Great, thanks for the quick replies. That last one below especially is quite a bit more than 1. As said before, most hardware isn't in fact going to need anything but I suppose udelay(2) might be the "safer" replacement for the outb then...Okayish I guess, especially when subsequent runs stay near those values. 2500/1730 = 1.45 us 746/600 ~= 1.24 us 4846 / 2400 = 2.02 us Rene. --
| Theodore Tso | Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 -- sys_fallocate |
| Jeff Garzik | Re: [RFC] Heads up on sys_fallocate() |
| Erez Zadok | [UNIONFS] 00/42 Unionfs and related patches review |
| Roland Dreier | Re: Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
git: | |
| Jon Smirl | Re: VCS comparison table |
| Andy Parkins | svn:externals using git submodules |
| Daniel Berlin | Re: Git and GCC |
| Sam Vilain | [PATCH] git-mergetool: add support for ediff |
| Richard Stallman | Real men don't attack straw men |
| Paul de Weerd | Re: Porting OpenBSD to OLPC XO laptops. |
| sonjaya | openvpn on openbsd 4.1 |
| Adliger Martinez von der Unterschicht | linux kills laptop hard drive... how does obsd behave? |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 0/37] dccp: Feature negotiation - last call for comments |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Andrew Morton | Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 11144] New: dhcp doesn't work with iwl4965 |
| Arjan van de Ven | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
