Cc: David Newall <david@...>, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...>, Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...>, Pavel Machek <pavel@...>, Andi Kleen <andi@...>, Alan Cox <alan@...>, David P. Reed <dpreed@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>, <rol@...>
On 11-12-07 16:37, Paul Rolland wrote:
Great, thanks for the quick replies.
That last one below especially is quite a bit more than 1. As said before,
most hardware isn't in fact going to need anything but I suppose udelay(2)
might be the "safer" replacement for the outb then...
Okayish I guess, especially when subsequent runs stay near those values.
2500/1730 = 1.45 us
746/600 ~= 1.24 us
4846 / 2400 = 2.02 us
Rene.
--