login
Header Space

 
 

Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern AMD64 with MCP51 laptops

Score:
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: David Newall <david@...>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...>, Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...>, Rene Herman <rene.herman@...>, Pavel Machek <pavel@...>, Andi Kleen <andi@...>, Alan Cox <alan@...>, David P. Reed <dpreed@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>, <rol@...>
Date: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 - 3:40 am

Hi,

On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 12:12:59 +1030
David Newall <david@davidnewall.com> wrote:


Well, if the delay is so much unspecified, what about _reading_ port 0x80 ?
Will the delay be shorter ? And if so, what about reading port 0x80 and
writing the value back ?
inb  al,0x80
outb 0x80,al

I've been wondering since the beginning of this thread if the problem is not
just the value we put to port 0x80, not writing to the port...

Just my 0.02 Eur...

Paul


-- 
Paul Rolland                                E-Mail : rol(at)witbe.net
Witbe.net SA                                Tel. +33 (0)1 47 67 77 77
Les Collines de l'Arche                     Fax. +33 (0)1 47 67 77 99
F-92057 Paris La Defense                    RIPE : PR12-RIPE

Please no HTML, I'm not a browser - Pas d'HTML, je ne suis pas un navigateur 
"Some people dream of success... while others wake up and work hard at it" 

"I worry about my child and the Internet all the time, even though she's too 
young to have logged on yet. Here's what I worry about. I worry that 10 or 15 
years from now, she will come to me and say 'Daddy, where were you when they 
took freedom of the press away from the Internet?'"
--Mike Godwin, Electronic Frontier Foundation 
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern A..., Paul Rolland, (Tue Dec 11, 3:40 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern A..., linux-os (Dick Johnson), (Tue Dec 11, 11:41 am)
More info on port 80 symptoms on MCP51 machine., David P. Reed, (Wed Dec 12, 4:07 pm)
Re: More info on port 80 symptoms on MCP51 machine., Rene Herman, (Wed Dec 12, 4:26 pm)
Re: More info on port 80 symptoms on MCP51 machine., Rene Herman, (Wed Dec 12, 4:58 pm)
Re: More info on port 80 symptoms on MCP51 machine., H. Peter Anvin, (Wed Dec 12, 5:05 pm)
Re: More info on port 80 symptoms on MCP51 machine., Chuck Ebbert, (Fri Dec 14, 6:05 pm)
Re: More info on port 80 symptoms on MCP51 machine., Rene Herman, (Sat Dec 15, 3:22 am)
Re: More info on port 80 symptoms on MCP51 machine., H. Peter Anvin, (Wed Dec 12, 5:12 pm)
RE: More info on port 80 symptoms on MCP51 machine., Allen Martin, (Sat Dec 15, 6:34 pm)
Re: More info on port 80 symptoms on MCP51 machine., H. Peter Anvin, (Sat Dec 15, 6:46 pm)
Re: More info on port 80 symptoms on MCP51 machine., David P. Reed, (Wed Dec 12, 4:37 pm)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern A..., linux-os (Dick Johnson), (Tue Dec 11, 4:27 pm)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern A..., linux-os (Dick Johnson), (Wed Dec 12, 9:11 am)
Attitude problems., David P. Reed, (Wed Dec 12, 3:42 pm)
Re: Attitude problems., linux-os (Dick Johnson), (Wed Dec 12, 4:31 pm)
Re: Attitude problems., linux-os (Dick Johnson), (Fri Dec 14, 12:01 pm)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern A..., Dr. David Alan Gilbert, (Sun Dec 9, 9:41 am)
Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern A..., Lennart Sorensen, (Tue Dec 11, 11:14 am)
speck-geostationary