Home » Mailing list archives » linux-kernel » 2007 » December » 11

Re: [PATCH][for -mm] fix accounting in vmscan.c for memory controller

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
[view in full thread]
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...>
To: <balbir@...>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, yamamoto@valinux.co.jp <yamamoto@...>, LKML <linux-kernel@...>, linux-mm@kvack.org <linux-mm@...>, riel@redhat.com <riel@...>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][for -mm] fix accounting in vmscan.c for memory controller
Date: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 - 1:29 am

On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 10:44:36 +0530
Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:


ALLOC_STALL is recoreded as failcnt, I think.
I think DIRECT can be accoutned easily.

But I'm not in hurry very much, because all reclaimation is DIRECT, now.
After we implement background reclaim, we should consider it.

Thanks,
-Kame

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
[PATCH][for -mm] fix accounting in vmscan.c for memory contr..., KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, (Mon Dec 10, 10:26 pm)
Re: [PATCH][for -mm] fix accounting in vmscan.c for memory c..., KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, (Tue Dec 11, 7:24 am)
Re: [PATCH][for -mm] fix accounting in vmscan.c for memory c..., Balbir Singh, (Tue Dec 11, 1:14 am)
Re: [PATCH][for -mm] fix accounting in vmscan.c for memory c..., KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, (Tue Dec 11, 1:29 am)
Re: [PATCH][for -mm] fix accounting in vmscan.c for memory c..., Balbir Singh, (Tue Dec 11, 1:36 am)