Re: [PATCH][for -mm] fix accounting in vmscan.c for memory controller

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, yamamoto@valinux.co.jp <yamamoto@...>, LKML <linux-kernel@...>, linux-mm@kvack.org <linux-mm@...>, riel@redhat.com <riel@...>
Date: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 - 1:14 am

KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:

Looks good to me.

Acked-by: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

TODO:

1. Should we have vm_events for the memory controller as well?
   May be in the longer term

-- 
	Warm Regards,
	Balbir Singh
	Linux Technology Center
	IBM, ISTL
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH][for -mm] fix accounting in vmscan.c for memory contr..., KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, (Mon Dec 10, 10:26 pm)
Re: [PATCH][for -mm] fix accounting in vmscan.c for memory c..., KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, (Tue Dec 11, 7:24 am)
Re: [PATCH][for -mm] fix accounting in vmscan.c for memory c..., Balbir Singh, (Tue Dec 11, 1:14 am)
Re: [PATCH][for -mm] fix accounting in vmscan.c for memory c..., KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, (Tue Dec 11, 1:29 am)