Re: [PATCH][for -mm] fix accounting in vmscan.c for memory controller

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Balbir Singh
Date: Monday, December 10, 2007 - 10:14 pm

KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:

Looks good to me.

Acked-by: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

TODO:

1. Should we have vm_events for the memory controller as well?
   May be in the longer term

-- 
	Warm Regards,
	Balbir Singh
	Linux Technology Center
	IBM, ISTL
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH][for -mm] fix accounting in vmscan.c for memory con ..., KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, (Mon Dec 10, 7:26 pm)
Re: [PATCH][for -mm] fix accounting in vmscan.c for memory ..., Balbir Singh, (Mon Dec 10, 10:14 pm)
Re: [PATCH][for -mm] fix accounting in vmscan.c for memory ..., KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, (Mon Dec 10, 10:29 pm)
Re: [PATCH][for -mm] fix accounting in vmscan.c for memory ..., KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, (Tue Dec 11, 4:24 am)